The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
5 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in PUBLIC LAWcompared with ENROLLED BILL

Technical corrections only. The changes reflect the bill's transition from an enrolled joint resolution (v4) to a public law (v5), incorporating the approval date and legislative history. There are no substantive changes to the operative text or policy of the resolution.

H.J.Res. 20·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 15, 2025

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heaters".

Became Public LawEnergySubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Palmer, Gary J. [R-AL-6]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
May 9, 2025

Bottom line

Congress has utilized the Congressional Review Act to block a Department of Energy rule that would have established new energy efficiency standards for gas-fired instantaneous water heaters.

What it actually does

This joint resolution, enacted as Public Law 119-6, formally disapproves a rule issued by the Department of Energy (DOE) concerning energy conservation standards for consumer gas-fired instantaneous water heaters. By doing so, Congress prevents the DOE's new energy efficiency standards, published in the Federal Register on December 26, 2024, from taking effect, thereby maintaining the existing regulatory framework for these appliances.

Proponents argue

Supporters of this resolution argue that the Department of Energy's proposed rule would have imposed unnecessary and costly burdens on manufacturers, potentially leading to higher upfront costs for consumers and limiting product availability without sufficient justification from energy savings. They contend that the rule represented an overreach of regulatory authority and that market forces, rather than mandates, should drive innovation in appliance efficiency.

Opponents contend

Opponents of this resolution (and proponents of the original DOE rule) would assert that the energy conservation standards are vital for reducing household energy consumption, lowering utility bills for consumers over the long term, and contributing to national environmental goals by decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. They would argue that the rule encourages technological advancement and ensures that new appliances meet essential efficiency benchmarks.

The bill text is exceptionally brief and can be read in a matter of seconds, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its direct legislative action.

Section 1

Congressional Disapproval of DOE Energy Conservation Standards Rule

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision explicitly states that Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of Energy (DOE) titled "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heaters," which was published in the Federal Register on December 26, 2024. As a direct consequence of this disapproval, the aforementioned DOE rule is rendered null and void, meaning it will not take effect and will have no legal force.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupManufacturers of gas-fired instantaneous water heatersImpactAvoids new manufacturing requirements and potential redesign costs associated with stricter energy efficiency standards.MechanismPrevents the implementation of the DOE rule that would have mandated higher efficiency.ScaleIndustry-wide, impacting all producers of these appliances.
GroupConsumers purchasing gas-fired instantaneous water heatersImpactMaintains current product availability and potentially lower upfront purchase prices, but foregoes potential long-term energy cost savings from more efficient models.MechanismPrevents changes to the market for these appliances that might have altered product offerings or initial costs.ScaleMillions of households that purchase or replace these appliances.
GroupDepartment of Energy (DOE)ImpactIts regulatory authority to set new energy conservation standards for this specific product is overridden by Congress.MechanismCongressional Review Act (CRA) disapproval, which legally nullifies the agency's rule.ScaleSpecific to this regulatory area, but has broader implications for agency rulemaking.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that blocking the rule protects manufacturers from costly compliance burdens and prevents potential increases in appliance prices for consumers, thereby preserving consumer choice and affordability in the market for water heaters.

Critics contend

Opponents contend that preventing the rule's implementation sacrifices significant opportunities for energy savings, contributes to higher long-term utility bills for consumers, and hinders efforts to reduce carbon emissions and promote environmental sustainability.

Tradeoffs

This provision navigates the tension between immediate economic considerations for manufacturers and consumers (e.g., production costs, upfront appliance prices) and the long-term benefits of enhanced energy efficiency, including reduced energy consumption, lower operating costs, and environmental protection. It also highlights the balance of power between executive agency rulemaking and congressional oversight.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this