The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.J.Res. 214·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 10, 2026

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Small Off-Road Engines Regulations; Notice of Decision".

IntroducedEnvironmental ProtectionSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 10, 2026

Bottom line

This resolution seeks to overturn an EPA rule that approved California's stricter emissions standards for small off-road engines, effectively blocking those standards from being implemented.

What it actually does

This joint resolution utilizes the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to disapprove a specific rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The rule in question, published on January 6, 2025, pertains to the EPA's decision regarding California's nonroad engine pollution control standards, specifically those for small off-road engines. If enacted, this resolution would nullify the EPA's rule, preventing it from taking effect and potentially impacting California's ability to implement its own stricter emissions standards for these engines.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that the EPA rule oversteps federal authority or imposes undue burdens on manufacturers and consumers by allowing California to set standards that could affect national markets. They may also argue for regulatory consistency across states or contend that the EPA's approval of California's rule was arbitrary or exceeded its statutory authority, thus warranting congressional disapproval.

Opponents contend

Opponents would contend that disapproving the EPA rule undermines states' rights to address local environmental concerns and public health. They would argue that California's standards are necessary to reduce air pollution from small off-road engines, protecting public health and the environment, and that the EPA's original approval was a valid exercise of its authority under the Clean Air Act.

The bill text is extremely short and can be read in seconds, making it highly accessible for immediate understanding.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives... That Congress disapproves the rule...

Disapproval of EPA Rule on California Nonroad Engine Standards

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision explicitly states that Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concerning "California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Small Off-Road Engines Regulations; Notice of Decision" (90 Fed. Reg. 640 (January 6, 2025)). By disapproving this rule, the joint resolution aims to prevent the EPA's decision from having any legal force or effect, thereby nullifying the EPA's approval of California's stricter emissions regulations for small off-road engines.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)ImpactAuthority to approve state-specific emissions standards is curtailed for this specific rule, and the agency is prevented from issuing a substantially similar rule.MechanismScale
GroupState of CaliforniaImpactAbility to implement stricter emissions standards for small off-road engines may be hindered or delayed, potentially affecting its air quality goals.MechanismScale
GroupManufacturers of small off-road engines (e.g., lawnmowers, generators)ImpactMay face less stringent or more uniform national emissions standards, rather than California's stricter ones, potentially reducing compliance costs.MechanismScale
GroupConsumers in CaliforniaImpactMay continue to purchase small off-road engines that emit higher levels of pollutants than if California's stricter standards were in effect, impacting local air quality.MechanismScale
GroupPublic health and environmental advocatesImpactPotential for increased air pollution from small off-road engines if stricter standards are not implemented, impacting public health and environmental quality.MechanismScale

Supporters argue

Supporters of the resolution argue that the EPA's approval of California's rule created an unnecessary regulatory burden or an uneven playing field for manufacturers. They may contend that federal standards should be uniform, or that California's specific standards are overly stringent and costly without sufficient environmental benefit, thus justifying congressional intervention to block the EPA's decision.

Critics contend

Opponents of the resolution argue that it undermines California's long-standing authority under the Clean Air Act to set its own, often stricter, emissions standards, which serve as a model for other states. They contend that blocking the EPA's approval prevents California from addressing its unique air quality challenges and deprives its residents of cleaner air, while also potentially hindering innovation in cleaner engine technology.

Tradeoffs

The resolution highlights a tension between states' rights to set stricter environmental standards (specifically California's waiver authority under the Clean Air Act) and the desire for national regulatory uniformity or reduced regulatory burden on industry. It also involves a tradeoff between potential economic costs for manufacturers to meet stricter standards and the public health and environmental benefits of reduced air pollution.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this