The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10004·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 30, 2026

Defending Our Energy and Water Act

IntroducedArmed Forces and National SecuritySubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Scholten, Hillary J. [D-MI-3]
Committees
Armed Services Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 30, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to reduce water consumption and enhance water resource protection in federal data center operations by updating existing efficiency mandates and extending their duration.

What it actually does

This bill mandates federal agencies to incorporate water efficiency requirements for new data centers and extends existing data center efficiency mandates. Specifically, it requires the Office of Electronic Government to revise minimum requirements for new data centers to include water resource protections, such as using water-efficient cooling systems. It also directs the Department of Defense to identify and integrate water efficiency technologies in its data centers.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill is a crucial step towards sustainable federal operations, addressing the significant water footprint of data centers, especially with the increasing demand for computing power. They contend that promoting water-efficient cooling systems and technologies will conserve vital water resources, enhance operational resiliency, and set a positive example for the private sector, aligning federal practices with environmental stewardship goals.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while the intent is good, mandating specific technologies or requirements could increase initial costs for federal data center upgrades or new constructions, potentially diverting funds from other critical IT infrastructure needs. They might also suggest that existing efficiency mandates are sufficient or that a more flexible approach, allowing agencies to innovate rather than prescribing specific solutions, would be more effective.

The bill is very concise and can be read and understood quickly, allowing ample time for evaluation.

Section 2(a)(1)

Mandate for Water-Efficient New Data Centers

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government to update existing minimum requirements for new federal data centers within 180 days of the bill's enactment. These updated requirements must specifically include measures for protecting water resources, emphasizing the use of the most water-efficient cooling systems available.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFederal agencies operating data centersImpactIncreased regulatory burden, potential for higher initial capital expenditure for new data centers, but long-term operational cost savings and environmental benefits.MechanismNew regulations and guidelines for data center construction and operation.ScaleApplies to all new federal data centers.
GroupWater utilities and local communities near data centersImpactReduced strain on local water supplies, improved environmental sustainability.MechanismDecreased water demand from federal data centers.ScaleLocalized but potentially significant in water-stressed regions.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision directly addresses the substantial water usage of modern data centers, ensuring that new federal infrastructure is built with sustainability in mind from the outset. They believe it will lead to significant water conservation and reduce the environmental footprint of government operations.

Critics contend

Some might contend that mandating "most water efficient" systems could be overly prescriptive or costly, potentially stifling innovation or imposing undue financial burdens on agencies, especially if cutting-edge technologies are significantly more expensive.

Tradeoffs

Balances environmental protection and water conservation against potential increases in initial construction costs and the flexibility of agencies in technology adoption.

Section 2(a)(2)

Extension of Existing Data Center Efficiency Sunset

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision amends the Carl Levin and Howard P. "Buck" McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 by extending the sunset date for existing minimum requirements for new data centers from "2026" to "2031." This means the current mandates for data center efficiency will remain in effect for an additional five years.

Section 2(b)

Department of Defense Water Efficiency Technology Integration

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends Title 10 of the U.S. Code, which governs the Department of Defense (DoD). It adds a new requirement for DoD data centers to identify and integrate potential water efficiency technologies. The goal is to enhance the resiliency of these data centers and minimize their impact on water resources.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this