The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10019·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 3, 2026

Incentivizing Value Capture for Greener Transportation Act

IntroducedTransportation and Public WorksMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. DeSaulnier, Mark [D-CA-10]
Committees
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 3, 2026

Bottom line

The bill seeks to leverage local economic growth spurred by transportation investments to fund sustainable transit projects and affordable housing, aiming to reduce environmental impact and congestion.

What it actually does

This bill establishes a new program within title 49, United States Code, to provide technical assistance grants to State and local governments. These grants aim to help develop "value capture" mechanisms for funding public transportation and affordable transit-oriented development, with a focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, vehicle miles traveled, and congestion. It also mandates the Secretary of Transportation to develop voluntary value capture standards and best practices.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that the bill offers an innovative, self-sustaining funding model for critical infrastructure by allowing communities to reinvest a portion of the increased property values and economic activity generated by public transit projects. This approach can reduce reliance on traditional federal funding, promote greener transportation, and foster affordable housing near transit hubs, addressing climate change and urban congestion simultaneously.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that "value capture" mechanisms, such as special assessments or impact fees, could disproportionately burden property owners or developers in transit-adjacent areas, potentially hindering economic development or increasing housing costs if not carefully implemented. Concerns could also be raised about the administrative complexity for State and local governments in developing and managing these new funding streams.

The bill is concise and can be read quickly, allowing for a good understanding of its core mechanisms within a short timeframe.

Section 3, amending 49 U.S.C. 5341(a)(1)

Technical Assistance Grants for Value Capture

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to provide grants to State and local governments. The purpose of these grants is to help recipients develop "value capture" mechanisms to secure long-term funding for public transportation and affordable transit-oriented development, improve mobility, and foster strategic partnerships for robust investments.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupState and local governmentsImpactReceive federal financial assistance and technical support.MechanismDirect grant funding.ScalePotentially significant, depending on appropriation levels.
GroupPublic transportation agenciesImpactPotential for new, long-term funding sources.MechanismIndirect benefit from state/local value capture initiatives.ScaleVaries by local implementation.

Supporters argue

Supporters contend that these grants are crucial for jumpstarting innovative local funding strategies, enabling communities to invest in sustainable transportation and affordable housing without solely relying on federal or state appropriations.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that without specific funding levels, the impact of these grants could be minimal, or that the program could create a new layer of bureaucracy without guaranteed significant outcomes.

Tradeoffs

Balances the desire for local funding innovation with the need for federal seed money and technical guidance.

Section 3, amending 49 U.S.C. 5341(a)(2)

Grant Eligibility Requirements: Performance and Funding Maintenance

prominently featuredmoderately complex

To receive a grant, applicants must demonstrate how the funds will increase transit capacity and ridership, and reduce carbon dioxide emissions, vehicle miles traveled, and congestion. Additionally, grantees must certify that they will maintain their existing funding levels for value capture, public transportation, and affordable transit-oriented development programs, with provisions for waivers in cases of financial hardship.

Section 3, amending 49 U.S.C. 5341(a)(3)

Prevailing Wage Requirements for Construction

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that laborers and mechanics employed on construction projects funded by these grants must be paid wages not less than those prevailing on similar local construction, as determined by the Secretary of Labor under the Davis-Bacon Act.

Section 3, amending 49 U.S.C. 5341(a)(8)

Establishment of Value Capture Standards and Best Practices

prominently featuredmoderately complex

The bill directs the Secretary of Transportation, in collaboration with State DOTs, MPOs, and regional councils of governments, to establish voluntary and consensus-based value capture standards, policies, and best practices. This is intended to promote greater investments in public transportation and affordable transit-oriented development. The Secretary must also report on existing state and local value capture laws and disseminate best practices.

Section 3, amending 49 U.S.C. 5341(b)

Key Definitions for Value Capture and Transit-Oriented Development

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section provides critical definitions for terms used throughout the bill. "Value capture" is defined as capturing incremental economic value from government investments to fund those investments. "Transit-oriented development" (TOD) is defined as mixed-use development near public transit promoting affordable housing and commercial space. "Affordable housing" is housing costing no more than 30% of family income, and "affordable commercial space" is for small/disadvantaged businesses below market rent.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this