The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10065·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 6, 2026

Methane Pollution Accountability Act

IntroducedEnergyMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Rivas, Luz M. [D-CA-29]
Committees
Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 6, 2026

Bottom line

The Methane Pollution Accountability Act aims to increase federal revenue and reduce methane emissions by requiring royalties on all produced gas, including wasted gas, from new federal leases and by locking in existing waste prevention regulations.

What it actually does

This bill mandates that royalties for gas produced from new Federal land and Outer Continental Shelf leases must be assessed on all gas produced, including gas lost through venting, flaring, or negligent releases. It provides specific exemptions for gas lost during emergencies, gas used on-lease for operational benefit, or gas that is unavoidably lost. Additionally, it requires the Director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to enforce an existing waste prevention rule and restricts the finalization of new rules that would revise it unless they demonstrably further minimize waste or improve air quality and public health.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill closes a loophole that currently allows oil and gas companies to waste natural gas through venting and flaring without paying royalties, thereby costing taxpayers revenue and contributing to climate change. They contend it promotes responsible resource management, incentivizes methane capture, and ensures fair compensation for public resources while improving air quality and public health.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that imposing royalties on lost gas increases the financial burden on producers, potentially discouraging domestic energy production and investment in federal lands. They may also contend that existing regulations are sufficient or that the bill's restrictions on future rulemaking limit necessary flexibility for the BLM to adapt to new technologies or market conditions.

The bill is very short and straightforward, allowing ample time for a thorough review of its provisions.

Section 2(a)

Mandating Royalties on All Gas Produced

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires that for all new leases issued after the bill's enactment, royalties must be paid on all gas produced from Federal land and the Outer Continental Shelf. This includes gas that is consumed or lost due to venting, flaring, or negligent releases from equipment during the initial extraction process. The intent is to ensure that companies pay for all gas extracted, not just what is sold.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupOil and gas companies operating on Federal land and Outer Continental ShelfImpactIncreased operational costs and potential revenue loss due to royalty payments on previously un-royalty-bearing wasted gas.MechanismDirect financial obligation through royalty assessment.ScalePotentially significant, depending on the volume of vented, flared, or negligently released gas.
GroupFederal government (Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management)ImpactIncreased royalty revenue.MechanismCollection of additional royalty payments.ScalePotentially millions to tens of millions of dollars annually, depending on market prices and waste volumes.
GroupPublic/EnvironmentImpactReduced methane emissions and improved air quality.MechanismFinancial incentive for companies to capture or reduce methane waste.ScaleBroad environmental benefit, contributing to climate change mitigation.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision ensures fair market value for public resources by requiring companies to pay for all gas extracted, not just what they sell. They contend it incentivizes companies to invest in technologies to capture methane, reducing a potent greenhouse gas and generating additional revenue for taxpayers.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that this provision imposes an unfair burden on producers by requiring payment for gas that cannot be economically captured or sold. They may claim it could disincentivize production on federal lands, leading to reduced energy supply and higher consumer costs.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the goal of maximizing public revenue and minimizing environmental waste against potential increases in operational costs for energy producers and concerns about impacts on domestic energy supply.

Section 2(b)

Exemptions for Certain Gas Losses

prominently featuredstraightforward

This subsection outlines specific situations where the new royalty requirement on all produced gas will not apply. These exceptions include gas vented or flared for up to 48 hours in emergency situations that threaten health, safety, or the environment; gas used or consumed directly on the lease area for the benefit of that lease; and gas that is deemed 'unavoidably lost.' These exemptions aim to provide flexibility for necessary operational activities and genuine unavoidable losses.

Section 3

Mandating Enforcement of Existing Waste Prevention Rule and Limiting Revisions

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section directs the Director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to enforce a specific final rule published on April 10, 2024, concerning waste prevention and royalties (89 Fed. Reg. 25378). Crucially, it prohibits the BLM from finalizing a proposed rule from June 24, 2026 (91 Fed. Reg. 37906), or any other rule that would revise the 2024 rule, unless the Director certifies that the new rule would further minimize natural gas waste or improve air quality and public health. This effectively locks in the 2024 rule as the baseline for waste prevention.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this