The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10080·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 10, 2026

Energy Utility Lobbying Ban Act

IntroducedEnergyMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Vindman, Eugene Simon [D-VA-7]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 10, 2026

Bottom line

This bill aims to reduce the influence of former state utility regulators lobbying their former agencies on behalf of electric utilities by linking compliance with federal energy program funding.

What it actually does

This bill conditions federal State Energy Program financial assistance on states implementing and enforcing specific lobbying restrictions for former state regulatory authority officers and employees concerning electric utilities. It mandates a 10% withholding of federal funds from states that do not comply with these prohibitions, which include a permanent ban on lobbying on matters of personal and substantial participation and a two-year ban on matters under official responsibility.

Proponents argue

Proponents would argue that this bill enhances public trust and reduces potential conflicts of interest by preventing a 'revolving door' phenomenon where former regulators immediately lobby their previous colleagues on behalf of the industry they once regulated. They would assert it promotes fair utility regulation and protects consumer interests by ensuring decisions are made based on merit, not undue influence.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that these restrictions could make it harder for states to attract qualified individuals to regulatory roles, as it limits their future employment options. They might also contend that experienced former regulators possess valuable institutional knowledge that could benefit the regulatory process, and that blanket prohibitions are overly broad and punitive, infringing on individuals' rights to pursue lawful employment.

The bill is short and its core provisions are easily understandable, allowing for quick evaluation.

Section 2(a)

Conditioning State Energy Program Financial Assistance

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that the Secretary of Energy will withhold 10% of State Energy Program financial assistance from any state that does not implement specific lobbying restrictions on its former regulatory authority officers and employees. These restrictions include a permanent ban on lobbying on matters they personally and substantially participated in, and a two-year ban on matters under their official responsibility.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupState GovernmentsImpactFinancial penalty (loss of 10% federal energy program funds)MechanismNon-compliance with lobbying restrictions triggers withholding.ScalePotentially millions of dollars annually per non-compliant state.
GroupState Regulatory AuthoritiesImpactMandate to implement and enforce new ethics rules.MechanismFederal requirement tied to funding.ScaleSignificant administrative burden for compliance and enforcement.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision provides a strong incentive for states to adopt critical ethics reforms, ensuring that federal funds are not indirectly supporting environments susceptible to undue corporate influence.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that withholding funds from state energy programs could harm legitimate state initiatives, penalizing citizens for state-level policy choices rather than directly addressing the lobbying issue.

Tradeoffs

Balances the federal interest in promoting ethical governance against state autonomy in setting their own ethics rules and the potential impact on state energy programs.

Section 2(a)(1) and (2)

Specific Lobbying Prohibitions for Former Regulators

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision requires states to prohibit former officers or employees of state regulatory authorities from lobbying their former agency on behalf of electric utilities. Specifically, there's a permanent ban on matters they 'personally and substantially participated in' and a two-year ban on matters that were under their 'official responsibility' within one year of termination.

Section 2(a)(3)

State Enforcement Mandate

prominently featuredstraightforward

States must not only prohibit the lobbying activities but also actively enforce these prohibitions. This includes investigating complaints, imposing penalties for noncompliance, and allowing affected parties to seek recovery of damages arising from violations.

Section 2(f)

Secretary of Energy's Administrative Duties

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision tasks the Secretary of Energy with establishing procedures for annual compliance reviews, maintaining a public database of state compliance, providing technical assistance to states, issuing interpretive guidance, establishing an appeal process for non-compliance determinations, and annually reporting to Congress on state compliance rates.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this