The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10092·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 13, 2026

GATE Act of 2026

IntroducedScience, Technology, CommunicationsMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Harrigan, Pat [R-NC-10]
Committees
Science, Space, and Technology Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 13, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to enhance national security by restricting access for individuals from designated adversarial nations to sensitive U.S. National Laboratory facilities and research, with a limited waiver mechanism.

What it actually does

This bill prohibits U.S. National Laboratories from admitting any foreign national from the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, or the Republic of Cuba as a visitor or long-term assignee. It includes a waiver provision allowing the Secretary of Energy, in consultation with counterintelligence officials, to grant exceptions if national security benefits outweigh risks, with mandatory congressional notification for each waiver.

Proponents argue

Supporters would argue this bill is crucial for safeguarding American technological advancements and intellectual property from foreign exploitation and espionage, particularly from countries identified as national security risks. They would emphasize the importance of protecting sensitive research and development conducted at National Laboratories to maintain U.S. economic and military advantage.

Opponents contend

Opponents might contend that such broad prohibitions could hinder scientific collaboration, limit access to global talent, and potentially disadvantage U.S. research by excluding highly skilled individuals who pose no actual threat. They might also raise concerns about potential discrimination or the practical challenges of implementing such a blanket ban, arguing it could lead to a 'brain drain' from the U.S.

The bill is very concise and can be read and understood quickly, allowing ample time for evaluation of its core provisions and implications.

Section 2(b)(1)

General Prohibition on Access for Covered Foreign Nationals

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision establishes a direct ban, preventing National Laboratories from allowing any 'covered foreign national' to be admitted as a visitor (short-term access) or an assignee (long-term access exceeding 30 days). It also requires existing approvals for such individuals to be revoked, ensuring immediate implementation of the new restrictions upon enactment.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupCovered Foreign Nationals (from China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba)ImpactProhibited from accessing U.S. National Laboratories.MechanismDirect statutory ban.ScaleAll individuals from these countries, unless they are lawful permanent residents or U.S. citizens.
GroupU.S. National LaboratoriesImpactRestricted in who they can admit, potentially impacting research collaboration and talent acquisition.MechanismCompliance with federal law.ScaleAll National Laboratories.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this is a necessary step to prevent espionage and technology transfer to adversarial nations, directly protecting critical U.S. research and national security interests from foreign exploitation.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that this blanket ban is overly broad and could exclude valuable scientific talent, potentially harming U.S. research competitiveness and international collaboration without sufficient evidence of individual risk.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances national security concerns against the potential benefits of international scientific collaboration and access to a global talent pool, prioritizing security through a broad prohibition.

Section 2(b)(2)

Secretary of Energy Waiver Authority

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision allows the Secretary of Energy to waive the general prohibition for a specific covered foreign national. This waiver can only be granted if the Secretary, after consulting with the Department of Energy's intelligence office and a senior FBI counterintelligence official, certifies that the benefits to the U.S. of admitting or granting access to that individual outweigh the national security and economic risks. The waiver must be issued in writing.

Section 2(b)(3)

Congressional Oversight of Waivers

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision mandates that the Secretary of Energy must notify several specific congressional committees within 30 days of issuing any waiver. The notification must detail the covered foreign national's country of origin, the dates of the request and decision, and the specific reasons for granting the waiver, ensuring transparency and legislative oversight of executive decisions.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this