The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10147·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 24, 2026

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule for the United States to establish a new subheading in chapter 39 for silicone prosthetics for women who are breast cancer survivors and a new subheading in chapter 90 for mastectomy bras.

IntroducedForeign Trade and International FinanceSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Miller, Carol D. [R-WV-1]
Committees
Ways and Means Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 24, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to reduce the cost of essential post-mastectomy products for breast cancer survivors by eliminating import tariffs.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS) to eliminate import duties on two specific categories of goods: silicone prosthetic breast forms for use with mastectomy brassieres and mastectomy brassieres themselves. Effective January 1, 2027, these items would be classified under new, duty-free subheadings in Chapters 39 and 90 of the HTS, respectively.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill provides crucial financial relief to breast cancer survivors by making necessary medical devices and specialized apparel more affordable. They contend that removing tariffs on these items will reduce out-of-pocket expenses, improve access to products that aid in recovery and quality of life, and align tariff policy with public health priorities.

Opponents contend

Critics, if any, might raise concerns about the incremental loss of federal tariff revenue, arguing that while individually small, such reductions accumulate. Some might also suggest that while the intent is laudable, tariff policy is not the most efficient or targeted mechanism for healthcare cost reduction, preferring direct subsidies or insurance coverage mandates.

The bill is very short and clear, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 1

Duty-Free Silicone Prosthetic Breast Forms

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends Chapter 39 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to create a new subheading, 3926.20.61, specifically for 'Silicone prosthetic breast forms for use with mastectomy brassieres.' Under this new classification, these items will be subject to a general duty rate of 0%, effectively making them duty-free upon import into the U.S. This change is scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2027.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupBreast cancer survivors and women who have undergone mastectomyImpactReduced cost for essential medical prostheticsMechanismElimination of import tariffs directly lowers the purchase price or allows importers to pass savings to consumers.ScaleIndividual financial relief for those requiring these items.
GroupImporters and retailers of silicone breast prostheticsImpactReduced cost of goods, potentially increased sales volumeMechanismLower import costs improve profit margins or allow for more competitive pricing.ScalePositive financial impact on businesses in this sector.
GroupFederal governmentImpactLoss of tariff revenueMechanismTariffs previously collected on these goods will no longer be levied.ScaleMinor, but quantifiable, reduction in federal revenue.

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that making silicone breast prosthetics duty-free directly addresses a financial burden on breast cancer survivors, who often face significant medical expenses. They contend that these prosthetics are not luxury items but essential components of post-mastectomy care, contributing to physical and emotional well-being.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against this provision, as the revenue impact is likely small and the benefit targets a vulnerable population. However, general arguments against tariff reductions could include concerns over potential impacts on domestic manufacturing (if any exists for these specific items) or the cumulative effect of lost tariff revenue.

Tradeoffs

The primary tradeoff is between a minor reduction in federal tariff revenue and the significant benefit of reducing healthcare-related costs for breast cancer survivors. It balances fiscal considerations with public health and patient access.

Section 2

Duty-Free Mastectomy Brassieres

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends Chapter 90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to create a new subheading, 9021.10.60, specifically for 'Mastectomy brassieres.' Similar to the prosthetics, these specialized bras will also be subject to a general duty rate of 0% when imported into the U.S. This change is also scheduled to become effective on January 1, 2027.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this