The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10162·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 27, 2026

STORMWATER Act

IntroducedEnvironmental ProtectionSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Kennedy, Timothy M. [D-NY-26]
Committees
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 27, 2026

Bottom line

The STORMWATER Act extends federal support for stormwater research centers, increases their fixed number to five, and establishes a dedicated center for the Great Lakes region.

What it actually does

This bill, known as the STORMWATER Act, extends the authorization for federal funding for centers of excellence focused on stormwater control infrastructure technologies. It shifts the authorization period from fiscal years 2022-2026 to 2027-2031. Additionally, it mandates that the number of such centers be fixed at five, rather than a range of three to five, and specifies that one of these five centers must be located in and focused on the Great Lakes region.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that extending the authorization for these centers is crucial for continuing vital research into stormwater management, which is increasingly important due to climate change and aging infrastructure. They contend that a dedicated Great Lakes center will address unique regional challenges, protecting a critical freshwater resource and supporting local economies dependent on it. The fixed number of centers ensures consistent investment and focus.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that extending authorizations without a thorough review of past performance could lead to inefficient spending. Some may also contend that mandating a specific number of centers and earmarking one for a particular region reduces flexibility and could prevent funding from being directed to areas with the most pressing or innovative research needs. Concerns about federal overreach into local infrastructure planning might also be raised.

The bill is very short and clear, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 2(a)(2) and 2(b)

Extension of Authorization for Stormwater Centers of Excellence

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision extends the period during which the Centers of Excellence for Stormwater Control Infrastructure Technologies are authorized to receive federal funding. The original authorization, set to expire in fiscal year 2026, is prolonged to cover fiscal years 2027 through 2031. This ensures continued federal support for research and development in stormwater management for an additional five years.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupAcademic and research institutionsImpactContinued funding and opportunities for research grants related to stormwater control.MechanismExtension of federal authorization for centers of excellence.ScaleNational
GroupCommunities and municipalitiesImpactPotential for improved stormwater management practices and infrastructure through research and innovation.MechanismApplication of research findings from the centers.ScaleLocal to regional

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that extending this authorization is essential to maintain momentum in developing innovative solutions for stormwater management, which is critical for environmental protection and public safety. They highlight the ongoing challenges posed by climate change and aging infrastructure, necessitating sustained research investment.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the general extension of research authorizations, though some might question the efficiency or necessity of continued funding without a detailed performance review of existing centers.

Tradeoffs

The primary tradeoff involves balancing the desire for sustained research and development in a critical area against the need for periodic review and potential reallocation of federal resources based on evolving priorities or demonstrated effectiveness.

Section 2(a)(1)

Fixed Number of Centers of Excellence

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section amends existing law to change the number of authorized Centers of Excellence for Stormwater Control Infrastructure Technologies from a flexible range of "not less than 3, and not more than 5, centers" to a fixed number of "5 centers." This ensures that the maximum number of centers originally allowed will be established and maintained, rather than allowing for fewer.

Section 2(a)(4)

Great Lakes Regional Center Mandate

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision adds a new requirement that one of the five authorized Centers of Excellence for Stormwater Control Infrastructure Technologies must be specifically located in and focused on the Great Lakes region. This earmarks a significant portion of the federal research effort to address the unique environmental and hydrological challenges faced by the Great Lakes and its surrounding communities.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this