The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10166·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 27, 2026

Foreign Propaganda Disclosure Act

IntroducedInternational AffairsMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 27, 2026

Bottom line

This bill expands the scope of the Foreign Agents Registration Act to explicitly cover monetized social media influencers, requiring them to register with the Department of Justice if they act on behalf of foreign principals.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) of 1938 to explicitly include social media influencers within the definition of an "agent of a foreign principal." It defines a "social media influencer" as any person with a monetized social media account on any social media platform, thereby requiring such individuals to register with the Department of Justice if they engage in activities on behalf of a foreign government or political party.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue this bill enhances transparency by ensuring that foreign influence operations conducted through social media are disclosed, protecting the public from undisclosed propaganda and foreign interference, especially given the rise of digital influence campaigns and the pervasive role of social media in information dissemination.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue this bill could stifle free speech, create an undue burden on individuals, or be difficult to enforce effectively without overreaching, potentially leading to a chilling effect on legitimate online expression and potentially targeting individuals for their content rather than genuine foreign agency.

The bill text is very short and can be read quickly, but its implications for free speech, foreign relations, and enforcement warrant significant consideration beyond a quick read.

Section 1

Short Title

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section simply names the Act the "Foreign Propaganda Disclosure Act," providing a common reference name for the legislation. This title clearly indicates the bill's primary focus on transparency regarding foreign influence.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupGeneral public and policymakersImpactProvides a clear and concise name for the legislation, aiding in public discourse and legislative tracking.MechanismScale

Supporters argue

Supporters would argue that a clear, descriptive short title helps the public and policymakers understand the bill's intent and scope, facilitating discussion and awareness of its purpose.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against short titles, as they are administrative and do not alter the substantive provisions of a bill.

Tradeoffs

None, as this provision is purely administrative.

Section 2

Expansion of FARA to Social Media Influencers

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section amends the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) of 1938 to explicitly include "a social media influencer" within the definition of "agent of a foreign principal." It further defines "social media influencer" as any person with a monetized social media account on any social media platform, and "social media platform" by reference to an existing statute (42 U.S.C. 1862w). This means individuals who are paid for their online content and act on behalf of foreign governments or political parties would be required to register with the Department of Justice, disclosing their foreign ties and activities.

FOUND

This subsection defines the term "social media platform" by referencing section 124 of the Trafficking Victims Prevention and Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022 (42 U.S.C. 1862w). This means the scope of platforms covered by the bill is determined by an external statute.

Section 2(s)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to avoid redundancy and ensure consistency with existing legal definitions across different statutes, promoting legal coherence.

Case for: Supporters would argue that referencing an existing definition ensures legal consistency and avoids creating conflicting definitions for similar terms across different statutes, streamlining the legislative process and reducing potential legal ambiguities.

Case against: Critics might argue that referencing external statutes makes the bill less accessible to the average reader, requiring additional legal research to fully comprehend its scope and implications, thereby reducing transparency.

Estimated impact: This reference determines the specific types of social media platforms to which the FARA amendments would apply, which could be broad depending on the referenced definition, thereby affecting the universe of potentially covered influencers.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this