The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10175·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 27, 2026

Banning Antiquated Duties and Delivering Equitable American Levies (BAD DEAL) Act of 2026

IntroducedForeign Trade and International FinanceMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Schneider, Bradley Scott [D-IL-10]
Committees
Ways and Means Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 27, 2026

Bottom line

The BAD DEAL Act aims to eliminate an outdated presidential authority to impose retaliatory tariffs and refund all duties collected under it, potentially impacting trade relations and federal revenue.

What it actually does

This bill repeals Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which grants the President authority to impose tariffs or duties on goods from countries that discriminate against U.S. commerce. It also nullifies any existing Presidential proclamations made under this section and mandates the refund of all tariffs or duties collected pursuant to these proclamations, both retroactively and prospectively.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that Section 338 is an antiquated and overly broad authority that can lead to arbitrary trade disputes and harm American consumers and businesses through increased costs. They contend that repealing it would promote more stable and predictable international trade relations, reduce the burden of tariffs on importers, and demonstrate a commitment to modernizing trade policy. The retroactive refund provision is seen as rectifying past harms caused by these duties.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that repealing Section 338 would strip the President of a crucial tool for negotiating with foreign countries and protecting U.S. economic interests against unfair trade practices. They may contend that this authority is necessary to deter trade discrimination and ensure a level playing field for American industries. Furthermore, the retroactive refund could create significant fiscal challenges and administrative complexities for the government.

The bill is exceptionally short and straightforward, allowing for quick comprehension of its core provisions.

Section 2(a)

Repeal of Trade Discrimination Authorities and Nullification of Proclamations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision eliminates Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which currently allows the President to impose special tariffs or duties on goods from countries found to be discriminating against U.S. commerce. It also declares that any existing Presidential orders or declarations that were issued based on this Section 338 are immediately void and have no legal effect.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupU.S. Presidents and Executive BranchImpactLoss of a specific trade authorityMechanismStatutory repealScaleSignificant, removes a long-standing tool
GroupForeign countries previously subject to Section 338 dutiesImpactPotential relief from existing tariffsMechanismNullification of proclamationsScaleVaries by country and specific proclamation

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this repeal removes an outdated and potentially misused presidential power that can lead to unpredictable trade policies and retaliatory measures, fostering a more stable global trade environment.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that this provision weakens the President's ability to respond to unfair trade practices by foreign nations, potentially leaving U.S. businesses vulnerable to discrimination without a strong deterrent.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between granting the Executive broad discretionary power to respond to trade discrimination and ensuring predictable, rules-based international trade.

Section 2(b)

Retroactive Refund of Collected Tariffs and Duties

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision requires the President to take all necessary steps to refund any tariffs or other duties that were imposed and collected under the authority of Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This refund applies to duties collected both before and after the bill's enactment date, making the repeal retroactively effective for financial purposes.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this