The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10176·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 27, 2026

No PRC Seafood in Congress Act

IntroducedCongressSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Smith, Christopher H. [R-NJ-4]
Committees
Committee on House Administration (primary)
Last action
Aug 27, 2026

Bottom line

This bill aims to prevent the U.S. Congress from inadvertently supporting industries that rely on forced labor in China by banning Chinese seafood products from its dining facilities and requiring supply chain transparency.

What it actually does

This bill prohibits the procurement, serving, or sale of Chinese seafood products in any dining facility within the U.S. Capitol Buildings or Capitol Grounds. It also mandates that relevant congressional entities issue regulations requiring seafood suppliers to certify the country of origin for all seafood products and maintain substantiating records.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill takes a principled stand against forced labor and human rights abuses in the People's Republic of China's seafood industry. By ensuring that congressional dining facilities do not serve products linked to such practices, the bill demonstrates a commitment to ethical sourcing and sends a clear message about U.S. values.

Opponents contend

Opponents might contend that this bill is largely symbolic and will have a negligible impact on the broader issue of forced labor in China, potentially diverting attention from more comprehensive and impactful policy solutions. They may also argue it could lead to minor administrative burdens or increased costs for congressional dining facilities.

The bill is very short and written in clear language, making it highly accessible for a thorough evaluation within a short timeframe.

Section 3(a)

Prohibition of Chinese Seafood Products

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision directly forbids any seafood product originating from the People's Republic of China from being purchased, served, or sold in any cafeteria, restaurant, or other food service establishment located within the U.S. Capitol Buildings or on the Capitol Grounds. This includes seafood fished, harvested, raised, produced, or processed in China, or by vessels owned, operated, or registered by China.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupCongressional dining facilities and their operatorsImpactMust cease procuring, serving, or selling Chinese seafood products.MechanismDirect statutory prohibition.ScaleLimited to U.S. Capitol facilities.
GroupSeafood suppliers to congressional dining facilitiesImpactMust ensure no Chinese seafood is supplied to these facilities.MechanismCompliance with new procurement rules.ScaleLimited to suppliers for U.S. Capitol facilities.
GroupSeafood industry in the People's Republic of ChinaImpactLoss of a small market segment (congressional dining facilities).MechanismDirect prohibition.ScaleMinimal economic impact, primarily symbolic.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision directly addresses the ethical concerns outlined in the bill's findings by ensuring that U.S. legislative branch facilities do not contribute to or benefit from forced labor practices in China's seafood industry.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that this specific prohibition is largely symbolic and will have negligible impact on the broader issue of forced labor in China, potentially diverting attention from more impactful policy solutions.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the symbolic stand against forced labor with potential minor administrative adjustments or sourcing changes for congressional dining facilities.

Section 3(b), (c)

Implementation Regulations and Supply Chain Certifications

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section mandates that specific congressional entities, such as the Committee on House Administration and the Architect of the Capitol, must issue regulations within 180 days to implement the seafood prohibition. These regulations will require all seafood suppliers to certify the country where each seafood product was fished, harvested, raised, produced, or processed, and to retain records to prove these certifications.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this