The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10190·119th Congress·Introduced Aug 31, 2026

Pennington County Land Conveyance Act

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Johnson, Dusty [R-SD-At Large]
Committees
Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Aug 31, 2026

Bottom line

This bill facilitates a no-cost transfer of a small parcel of federal land to Pennington County, South Dakota, enabling the county to develop public works facilities and adjust federal land designations accordingly.

What it actually does

This bill directs the Secretary of Agriculture to convey approximately 8.97 acres of National Forest System land within the Black Hills National Forest to Pennington County, South Dakota. The transfer will occur without monetary consideration, allowing the county to use the land for a public works facility or other necessary public uses. Upon conveyance, the boundary of the Black Hills National Forest will be modified to reflect the change.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this conveyance will enable Pennington County to develop essential public works facilities, serving local community needs efficiently by utilizing federal land that may be better suited for local administration. They emphasize the benefit of local control over land for public services and the streamlined process for community development.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue against the precedent of conveying federal land without consideration, potentially diminishing the National Forest System's integrity or setting a precedent for similar requests. Concerns could also be raised about the specific future use of the land and potential environmental impacts, even if minor, given the broad discretion granted to the county.

The bill is exceptionally short and clearly written, allowing for a quick and comprehensive understanding of its provisions within minutes.

Section 2(b)

Conveyance of Federal Land to Pennington County

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer approximately 8.97 acres of land located within the Black Hills National Forest to Pennington County, South Dakota. The transfer will be made without any monetary cost to the county. The county is authorized to use this land for a public works facility or any other uses it deems necessary for public benefit. Following the transfer, the Secretary is required to officially modify the boundary of the Black Hills National Forest to exclude this conveyed parcel.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupPennington County, South DakotaImpactGains ownership and control of federal land for public use without incurring acquisition costs.MechanismDirect conveyance by the Secretary of Agriculture.ScaleApproximately 8.97 acres.
GroupBlack Hills National ForestImpactExperiences a minor reduction in its total land area and a modification of its official boundary.MechanismBoundary modification by the Secretary following the conveyance.ScaleMinor reduction of 8.97 acres.
GroupLocal residents of Pennington CountyImpactPotentially benefits from improved or new public services and infrastructure facilitated by the county's use of the conveyed land.MechanismCounty utilizes the acquired land for public works or other necessary public facilities.ScaleLocalized benefit within the county.

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that this conveyance is a practical solution to facilitate local public infrastructure development, allowing Pennington County to better serve its constituents by utilizing a small parcel of federal land for essential public works. They highlight the efficiency of transferring land that is more suitable for local management and public service provision.

Critics contend

Opponents might contend that conveying federal land, even a small parcel, without consideration sets an undesirable precedent for the disposition of National Forest System lands. They could argue that such transfers should undergo more rigorous review or require fair market value to protect federal assets and public interest in national forests, questioning the long-term implications of such policies.

Tradeoffs

This provision navigates the tradeoff between supporting local government needs for public infrastructure and maintaining the integrity and acreage of the National Forest System. It prioritizes a specific local public benefit over the federal government's continued ownership of a small, potentially isolated parcel of national forest land.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this