The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10294·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 3, 2026

Better Pay for American Workers Act

IntroducedLabor and EmploymentMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Torres, Norma J. [D-CA-35]
Committees
Education and Workforce Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 3, 2026

Bottom line

This bill significantly raises the federal minimum wage to $20.00 per hour by 2029 and then indexes it to median wage growth, aiming to improve living standards for low-wage workers.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to incrementally increase the federal minimum wage over three years. It mandates a rise to $15.00 per hour in 2027, $17.50 in 2028, and $20.00 in 2029. Beginning in 2030, the minimum wage would be annually adjusted based on the percentage increase in the median hourly wage, as determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that increasing the minimum wage is essential to ensure that full-time workers can earn a living wage, reduce poverty, and stimulate economic growth by boosting consumer spending among low-income households. They contend that the current minimum wage is insufficient to cover basic living expenses and that indexing it to median wage growth will prevent its erosion by inflation and ensure long-term wage stability.

Opponents contend

Opponents typically argue that a significant increase in the minimum wage could lead to job losses, particularly in industries with thin profit margins, as businesses may reduce staff or slow hiring to offset increased labor costs. They also suggest it could lead to higher prices for consumers as businesses pass on increased costs, potentially fueling inflation, and that it interferes with market-driven wage setting.

The bill is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its core provisions quickly.

Section 2(a) of the bill, amending Section 6(a) and adding Section 6(h) to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206)

Federal Minimum Wage Increase and Annual Indexing

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision raises the federal minimum wage in a series of steps: to $15.00 per hour starting January 1, 2027; to $17.50 per hour starting January 1, 2028; and to $20.00 per hour starting January 1, 2029. After these initial increases, beginning January 1, 2030, and annually thereafter, the minimum wage will be adjusted based on the annual percentage increase in the median hourly wage of all employees, as determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, rounded to the nearest $0.05.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupLow-wage workers currently earning below the new minimum wageImpactIncreased hourly wages, potentially leading to improved financial stability and purchasing power.MechanismDirect statutory mandate for employers to pay a higher minimum wage.ScaleMillions of workers nationwide, particularly in service, retail, and hospitality sectors.
GroupBusinesses employing low-wage workersImpactIncreased labor costs.MechanismDirect statutory mandate for employers to pay a higher minimum wage.ScalePotentially significant for small businesses and those with tight margins; less so for larger corporations or those already paying above the proposed minimum.
GroupConsumersImpactPotential for increased prices for goods and services.MechanismBusinesses passing on increased labor costs.ScaleWidespread, affecting all consumers to varying degrees.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this phased increase provides businesses time to adjust while ensuring workers receive a fair wage that keeps pace with the cost of living. Indexing to the median wage prevents future erosion of purchasing power and provides long-term predictability.

Critics contend

Critics contend that these substantial increases, particularly the jump to $20.00, could force businesses to cut jobs, reduce hours, or automate tasks, especially in regions with lower costs of living. They also argue that tying the minimum wage to the median wage could create an inflationary spiral.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the goal of improving worker living standards against concerns about potential job losses, business closures, and inflationary pressures. It also navigates the tension between a fixed minimum wage that loses value over time and an indexed wage that provides stability but might be less predictable for businesses.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this