The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10305·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 8, 2026

Strengthening Oversight in Public Buildings Act

IntroducedWater Resources DevelopmentSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Perry, Scott [R-PA-10]
Committees
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 15, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to improve transparency and efficiency in federal property management by increasing data access for oversight bodies and providing GSA with conditional flexibility for building utilization.

What it actually does

This bill amends existing legislation to enhance oversight of federal building management and leasing. It grants the Comptroller General (GAO) and the Public Buildings Reform Board greater access to data on federal property utilization, clarifies oversight requirements for agencies with independent leasing authority, and provides the General Services Administration (GSA) with more flexibility to use federal buildings as 'swing space' to facilitate sales or major renovations of other properties, subject to cost-saving conditions and congressional reporting.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill will significantly improve accountability and efficiency in federal real estate management by providing critical data to oversight bodies like the GAO and the Public Buildings Reform Board. They contend that clarifying independent leasing authority and enabling GSA to strategically use swing space will streamline property sales and renovations, ultimately reducing costs and optimizing the federal footprint.

Opponents contend

Opponents might express concerns that while increased data sharing is beneficial, it could also lead to increased administrative burdens on federal agencies, potentially diverting resources from core missions. Some might also question the extent of GSA's discretion in retaining 'swing space,' arguing that without rigorous oversight, such flexibility could lead to prolonged retention of underutilized assets rather than prompt disposition.

The bill is short and relatively straightforward, making it accessible for a quick read. However, understanding its full implications requires familiarity with the referenced acts, which adds to the necessary background research.

Section 2(a)

GAO Access to Federal Property Data

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 2024 to mandate that the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Administrator of General Services (GSA) provide the Comptroller General of the United States (GAO) with all data and reports collected under specific subsections (c), (e), and (f) of Section 2302 of that Act. This ensures GAO has comprehensive information regarding federal property utilization and management.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupComptroller General (GAO)ImpactIncreased access to dataMechanismStatutory mandate for data provisionScaleSignificant, enabling more thorough oversight
GroupFederal agencies (OMB, GSA)ImpactIncreased reporting requirementsMechanismMandate to provide data to GAOScaleModerate, requiring data compilation and submission

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that providing GAO with direct and comprehensive access to federal property data is crucial for effective oversight, enabling them to identify inefficiencies, wasteful spending, and opportunities for improvement in federal real estate management.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against increasing GAO's access to data, as it is generally seen as a mechanism for good governance and accountability.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension is between the desire for robust oversight and the potential administrative burden on agencies to compile and submit the required data, though the benefits of transparency are generally seen to outweigh these costs.

Section 2(b)

Oversight of Agencies with Independent Leasing Authority

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section clarifies and strengthens oversight for federal agencies that have independent authority to lease office space. It ensures that the requirements of Section 2302 of the Carper Act apply to all such agencies, regardless of their coverage under other financial statutes. It also mandates that the Director of OMB submit a list of these agencies to Congress and GAO within one year and ensure their compliance with reporting requirements.

Section 3

GSA Authority for Swing Space

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Carper Act to allow the Administrator of General Services (GSA) to retain a specific federal building (referenced in the original Act) for use as 'swing space.' This means the building can be used temporarily to house federal employees or operations while other federal buildings are being sold or undergoing major renovations. This flexibility is conditional: the cost of retaining the swing space must not exceed the savings realized from the sale or renovation of other buildings, and GSA must submit annual plans for its use to Congress.

Section 4

Extension and Data Access for Public Buildings Reform Board

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section extends the operational period of the Public Buildings Reform Board by two years, from December 31, 2026, to December 31, 2028. Additionally, it mandates that the Director of OMB and the Administrator of GSA provide the Board with all data and reports collected under Section 2302 of the Carper Act, mirroring the data access granted to the GAO.

FOUND

The bill's effectiveness hinges on the content of Section 2302 of the Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 2024, particularly subsections (c), (e), and (f), which outline the specific data and reports that must be provided to the GAO and the Public Buildings Reform Board.

Section 2(a) and 4(2)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to avoid reprinting lengthy sections of existing law, making the bill concise but requiring external reference for full comprehension.

Case for: Supporters would argue that this approach maintains legislative efficiency, avoiding redundancy by building upon existing legal frameworks and focusing only on the amendments.

Case against: Critics might contend that relying heavily on cross-references makes the bill less accessible to the public and requires specialized legal research to fully grasp its implications, potentially obscuring the true scope of data being shared.

Estimated impact: The impact is significant, as these subsections likely detail key metrics on federal property utilization, costs, and agency compliance, which are central to effective oversight.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this