The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10391·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 15, 2026

National Risk Assessments Extension Act

IntroducedInternational AffairsNarrow
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Gonzalez, Vicente [D-TX-34]
Committees
Financial Services Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 15, 2026

Bottom line

The bill extends reporting deadlines for national strategies on combating illicit finance and updates the specific risk assessment documents to be referenced in those strategies.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 to extend the deadlines for the President to submit national strategies for combating terrorist and other illicit financing from 2024 and 2026 to 2028 and 2030, respectively. Additionally, it updates the specific documents that these strategies must reference, shifting from older national strategy documents to more recent and specific risk assessments concerning money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing.

Section 1

Short Title

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section establishes the official short title of the Act as the "National Risk Assessments Extension Act." This title provides a concise and easily referenceable name for the legislation, aiding in its identification and discussion within legislative and public discourse.

Section 2(1)

Extension of Deadlines for National Strategy Submission

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends section 261(b)(2) of the Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017. It changes the required submission years for the national strategy for combating terrorist and other illicit financing from "2024" to "2028" and from "2026" to "2030." This effectively grants the President and relevant Executive Branch agencies an additional four years to submit these mandated strategies to Congress.

Section 2(2)

Update to Referenced National Strategy Documents

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends section 262(1) of the Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017. It replaces references to the "2020 National Strategy for Combating Terrorist and Other Illicit Financing" and "2022 National Strategy for Combating Terrorist and Other Illicit Financing" with references to the "2026 National Money Laundering Risk Assessment," "2026 National Terrorist Financing Risk Assessment," and "2026 National Proliferation Financing Risk Assessment." This updates the foundational documents that the national strategy for combating illicit finance must consider, shifting focus to more current and specific risk assessments.

FOUND

This provision changes the specific documents that the President's national strategy for combating illicit finance must reference. Instead of referencing the "2020 National Strategy for Combating Terrorist and Other Illicit Financing" and "2022 National Strategy for Combating Terrorist and Other Illicit Financing," it requires referencing the "2026 National Money Laundering Risk Assessment," "2026 National Terrorist Financing Risk Assessment," and "2026 National Proliferation Financing Risk Assessment."

Section 2(2)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice for updating references to current official documents. It's a technical update to ensure strategies are based on the most recent data and assessments, rather than an attempt to hide a controversial policy.

Case for: Supporters would argue that this update ensures the national strategy is informed by the most current and granular risk assessments, reflecting an evolving understanding of illicit finance threats. It allows for a more targeted and data-driven approach to combating money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing.

Case against: Critics might contend that replacing comprehensive "national strategies" with more specific "risk assessments" could potentially narrow the scope of the President's overall strategy, focusing too much on risk identification rather than broader strategic policy development and implementation.

Estimated impact: This change refines the analytical foundation for future national strategies on illicit finance, potentially leading to more focused policy recommendations and resource allocation within the Executive Branch.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
Ask Ledger AI about this