No Fencing at the United States Capitol Complex Act
- Sponsor
- Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
- Committees
- Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
- Last action
- Sep 15, 2026
Bottom line
This bill seeks to prevent the installation of any new permanent security fencing around the U.S. Capitol and its grounds, while preserving the ability to maintain existing barriers.
What it actually does
This bill prohibits the use of any Federal funds to install new permanent fencing around the United States Capitol, any of the Capitol Buildings, or any portion of the Capitol Grounds. It explicitly allows for the repair or replacement of fencing that was already in existence on the date of the Act's enactment.
Proponents argue
Supporters argue that preventing new permanent fencing maintains the Capitol as a symbol of open democracy and public access, rather than transforming it into an inaccessible fortress. They believe that less intrusive security measures are sufficient and that permanent barriers detract from the public nature of the institution.
Opponents contend
Critics contend that prohibiting new permanent fencing could compromise the safety and security of Members of Congress, staff, and visitors, especially in an era of heightened threats. They argue that security professionals should have all necessary tools, including physical barriers, to protect the Capitol complex effectively.
The bill is exceptionally short and clear, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its core purpose quickly.
Section 2(a)
Prohibition on New Permanent Fencing Around United States Capitol
This section explicitly forbids the use of any federal money to build or put up new permanent fences around the United States Capitol Building, any other Capitol Buildings, or any part of the Capitol Grounds. It aims to prevent any expansion of permanent physical barriers in these areas, ensuring that the current footprint of permanent fencing is not increased.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that preventing new permanent fencing maintains the Capitol as a symbol of open democracy and public access, rather than transforming it into an inaccessible fortress. They believe that less intrusive security measures are sufficient and that permanent barriers detract from the public nature of the institution.
Critics contend
Critics contend that prohibiting new permanent fencing could compromise the safety and security of Members of Congress, staff, and visitors, especially in an era of heightened threats. They argue that security professionals should have all necessary tools, including physical barriers, to protect the Capitol complex effectively.
Tradeoffs
This provision balances the desire for enhanced security against the symbolic importance of an open and accessible Capitol. It highlights the tension between physical protection and the democratic ideal of public engagement with government.
Section 2(b)
Repair and Replacement of Existing Fencing Permitted
This subsection clarifies that the prohibition on new permanent fencing does not prevent the repair or replacement of any fencing that was already in place around the Capitol complex on the date the Act is passed. This ensures that existing security infrastructure can be maintained without being expanded, allowing for necessary upkeep of current barriers.