The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecords

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10405·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 16, 2026

Kylie’s Voices for Childhood Cancer Act

IntroducedHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Gottheimer, Josh [D-NJ-5]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 16, 2026

Bottom line

This bill aims to enhance the focus on pediatric cancer within state and federal health programs by ensuring expert representation, dedicated advisory guidance, and flexible funding options.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the inclusion of at least two pediatric cancer experts in State comprehensive cancer control coalitions as a condition for receiving federal funding. It establishes a new federal advisory committee, the Cancer Control Plan Pediatric Cancer Advisory Committee, to develop resources and recommendations for pediatric and adolescent/young adult cancer. Additionally, it expands the allowable uses of Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grants to include pediatric-specific cancer initiatives.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill will ensure that the unique needs of pediatric cancer patients are adequately addressed in state and federal cancer control strategies, leading to improved outcomes for children and young adults battling cancer. They emphasize the critical importance of expert input and dedicated resources for this vulnerable population, whose cancers often differ significantly from adult cancers.

Opponents contend

No specific organized opposition is typically raised against bills focused on pediatric cancer research or support, as such initiatives generally receive broad bipartisan support. Potential concerns, if any, might revolve around the administrative burden of establishing new committees or mandates, or the allocation of existing funds, but these are not explicitly stated as opposition to this bill.

The bill is very short and easy to read, allowing ample time for thorough evaluation.

Section 2, amending Part B of title III of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 243 et seq.) by inserting new section 317W.

Mandate Pediatric Cancer Expert Representation in State Coalitions

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires states to include at least two pediatric cancer experts in their comprehensive cancer control coalitions as a condition for receiving federal funding for their cancer control plans. This ensures that state-level strategies consider the specific challenges and needs of children with cancer, integrating specialized knowledge into public health planning.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupState comprehensive cancer control coalitionsImpactMandated change in membership compositionMechanismCondition for federal funding receiptScaleNational, affecting all states receiving relevant federal assistance
GroupPediatric cancer patients and their familiesImpactPotential for improved, more tailored cancer control plans and servicesMechanismExpert input into state strategies leading to better resource allocationScaleIndirect, through state policy changes

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that including pediatric cancer experts directly in state coalitions will ensure that state cancer control plans are specifically tailored to the unique aspects of childhood cancers, which differ significantly from adult cancers in terms of biology, treatment, and long-term effects. This direct input is crucial for effective resource allocation and strategy development.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against this provision, as it aims to improve expert representation in a critical public health area. Any potential concerns might be administrative, related to identifying and appointing qualified individuals, but these are generally considered minor compared to the benefits.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension is balancing the need for specialized expertise with the existing structure and priorities of state cancer control coalitions. While beneficial, it adds a specific mandate to state-level planning, potentially requiring adjustments in current operational frameworks.

Section 3

Establishment of Pediatric Cancer Advisory Committee

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section establishes a new advisory committee under the Secretary of Health and Human Services, composed of representatives from various federal health agencies and individuals with pediatric cancer expertise or lived experience (survivors, caregivers). The committee is tasked with developing resources, best practices, and recommendations for addressing pediatric cancer in state plans, advising on funding use, and developing best practices for adolescent/young adult cancer. It will sunset after two years.

Section 4, amending Section 501(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 701(a)(1)).

Expand Use of MCH Block Grants for Pediatric Cancer Initiatives

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision adds a new allowable use for Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant funds. States can now use these funds specifically 'to meet pediatric-specific initiatives and goals within Comprehensive Cancer Control programs of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and to implement recommendations of the Cancer Control Plan Pediatric Cancer Advisory Committee established under section 3 of the Kylie's Voices for Childhood Cancer Act.'

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask