The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10413·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 16, 2026

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the qualified elementary and secondary education scholarships credit limit for married taxpayers filing a joint return.

IntroducedTaxationSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Smith, Adrian [R-NE-3]
Committees
Ways and Means Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 16, 2026

Bottom line

The bill increases the tax credit limit for donations to qualified elementary and secondary education scholarship programs for married couples filing jointly, effectively doubling their potential credit.

What it actually does

This bill amends Section 25F(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to double the qualified elementary and secondary education scholarships credit limit for married taxpayers who file a joint return. Currently, the credit limit applies per taxpayer, and this amendment would allow joint filers to claim a credit up to 200 percent of the individual limit. The change would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill supports school choice by incentivizing donations to scholarship programs that help families afford private education. They contend it provides tax relief to married couples who choose to invest in educational opportunities outside the public system, aligning with principles of parental choice and educational freedom. Supporters believe it encourages philanthropic giving to improve educational access for students.

Opponents contend

Opponents typically argue that increasing tax credits for private school scholarships diverts resources and attention from public education systems, which serve the vast majority of students. They may contend that such credits disproportionately benefit higher-income families who are more likely to utilize private schools or make substantial donations, exacerbating educational inequities. Critics also raise concerns about the potential for reduced federal tax revenue without clear evidence of broad public benefit.

The bill is exceptionally short and can be read and understood in less than a minute, making it highly accessible to any interested reader.

Section 1(a)

Increased Education Scholarship Credit Limit for Joint Filers

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Internal Revenue Code to allow married taxpayers filing a joint return to claim a qualified elementary and secondary education scholarships credit up to 200 percent of the amount allowed for individual filers. This effectively doubles the maximum credit limit for couples compared to what two individuals could claim separately under the existing structure. The change takes effect for tax years starting after December 31, 2025.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupMarried taxpayers filing jointlyImpactFinancial benefit (tax reduction)MechanismIncreased tax credit limit for donations to qualified education scholarship organizations.ScalePotentially significant for those making substantial donations.
GroupQualified elementary and secondary education scholarship programsImpactIncreased funding potentialMechanismTax incentives encourage larger donations from married couples.ScaleModerate to significant, depending on donor response.
GroupStudents receiving private school scholarshipsImpactIncreased access to fundingMechanismMore donations to scholarship programs could lead to more available scholarships.ScaleIndirect, but potentially positive.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this provision strengthens school choice by providing a greater incentive for married couples to contribute to scholarship funds, thereby expanding educational options for students. They believe it recognizes the financial contributions of families and encourages philanthropic investment in education.

Critics contend

Critics contend that this provision primarily benefits wealthier married couples who are most likely to make large donations to private school scholarship programs, further entrenching educational disparities. They argue it represents a tax break that could reduce federal revenue, potentially at the expense of public education funding.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the goal of promoting school choice and providing tax incentives for charitable giving against concerns about equity, the potential for regressive tax benefits, and the impact on federal revenue and public school funding.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this