The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10424·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 16, 2026

Equity in Research Act

IntroducedEducationSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Carter, Troy A. [D-LA-2]
Committees
Science, Space, and Technology Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 16, 2026

Bottom line

The bill creates a new NSF grant program specifically for minority-serving and land-grant institutions to boost their research infrastructure and capacity.

What it actually does

This bill establishes a National Science Foundation (NSF) grant program to provide financial assistance to various categories of minority-serving institutions and land-grant universities. The grants, ranging from $1 million to $5 million, are intended to help these institutions develop and enhance research facilities in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, medical matters, and other research and development areas. Eligible uses include infrastructure improvements, equipment, maintenance, and personnel costs directly associated with research activities.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill addresses historical inequities in research funding by targeting institutions that serve diverse student populations and have often been under-resourced in terms of research infrastructure. They contend that strengthening research capacity at these institutions will foster innovation, expand the national scientific talent pool, and contribute to economic development in the communities they serve, ultimately enhancing the overall U.S. research enterprise.

Opponents contend

Critics, while generally supportive of strengthening research, might argue that creating a highly specific grant program could divert funds from broader, merit-based competitive grants that are open to all institutions. Some may also raise concerns about the administrative burden on the NSF to manage a new program with potentially many applicants, or question whether the specified grant amounts are sufficient to achieve truly 'sustainable' improvement without more comprehensive, long-term funding strategies.

The bill is very short and straightforward, allowing a reader to fully understand its provisions well within the time typically allotted for legislative review.

Section 2(a)

Establishment of NSF Grant Program

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision directs the Director of the National Science Foundation (NSF) to create a grant program. The purpose of this program is to offer financial aid to specific types of higher education institutions, helping them to develop and improve their research facilities. The focus areas for these facilities include science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), medical research, and other general research and development activities.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupNational Science FoundationImpactIncreased administrative responsibilityMechanismRequired to establish and manage a new grant programScaleModerate
GroupEligible Institutions of Higher EducationImpactOpportunity for funding and capacity buildingMechanismCan apply for grants to enhance research facilities and operationsScaleSignificant for recipient institutions
GroupResearchers and Students at Eligible InstitutionsImpactImproved research environment and opportunitiesMechanismAccess to better facilities, equipment, and support personnelScaleDirect and positive

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that establishing this targeted grant program is crucial for addressing long-standing disparities in research funding and infrastructure among institutions. They believe it will foster a more inclusive and robust national research ecosystem by empowering institutions that serve diverse student populations to contribute more significantly to scientific advancements.

Critics contend

While direct opposition to the program's goal is unlikely, some might argue that creating new, specific grant programs can lead to fragmentation of federal research efforts or administrative inefficiencies. They might suggest that existing NSF programs could be expanded or modified to achieve similar goals without establishing a separate, potentially duplicative, mechanism.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between targeted funding to address historical inequities and the potential for a more streamlined, broader competitive funding approach. While targeted funding ensures specific institutions receive support, it could be seen by some as less efficient than a single, larger competitive pool.

Section 2(d)

Definition of Eligible Institutions

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section precisely defines which institutions of higher education are eligible to receive grants under the new program. It lists ten specific categories, including Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), Hispanic-serving institutions, Tribal colleges, Native Hawaiian-serving institutions, Predominantly Black institutions, Native American-serving, nontribal institutions, Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander-serving institutions, Minority-serving institutions (a general category), 1890's Land Grant Universities, and 1994 Land Grant institutions.

Section 2(e)

Authorization of Appropriations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision authorizes the appropriation of $50,000,000 to the Director of the National Science Foundation for fiscal year 2027 and for every subsequent fiscal year. This authorization provides the legal basis for Congress to allocate funds for the grant program established by the bill, indicating the intended scale of federal investment in this initiative.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this