The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10491·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 17, 2026

CHARGE Act

IntroducedHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Davidson, Warren [R-OH-8]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 17, 2026

Bottom line

The bill mandates a federal scientific study to investigate the environmental and health impacts of high-voltage power lines on communities and agriculture.

What it actually does

This bill directs the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to conduct a comprehensive study on the potential effects of very high-voltage electrical transmission lines (750-kilovolt or greater) on both human and livestock health, as well as on agricultural crop yields. Upon completion, the findings must be reported to key congressional committees.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this study is a crucial step to address long-standing public concerns regarding the safety and environmental impact of high-voltage transmission lines. They contend that robust scientific data is essential for informing future energy policy, protecting public health, and ensuring the viability of agricultural lands near such infrastructure.

Opponents contend

Critics might express concerns that mandating such a study could potentially delay critical energy infrastructure projects necessary for grid modernization and reliability. They may also argue that existing research on electromagnetic fields is sufficient, or that the study's scope could be too broad or narrow to yield definitive, actionable results without significant cost.

The bill is exceptionally brief and clear, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its core purpose and provisions quickly.

Section 2(a)

NIH Study on Effects of 750-Kilovolt or Greater Transmission Lines

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), conduct a study as soon as practically feasible. The study is specifically tasked with investigating the effects of 750-kilovolt or greater transmission lines on two distinct areas: the health of both humans and livestock, and the yields of agricultural crops. This aims to provide scientific data on potential impacts.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupRural communities and residents near high-voltage transmission linesImpactPotential health and environmental concerns addressed through scientific investigationMechanismThe study aims to provide data that could inform future safety guidelines or policy decisions.ScaleNational, affecting areas where such lines are present or planned.
GroupFarmers and agricultural businessesImpactPotential impacts on crop yields investigated, which could affect agricultural productivity and economic stability.MechanismScientific research to determine if high-voltage lines negatively affect crop growth.ScaleNational, affecting agricultural regions with or near transmission infrastructure.
GroupNational Institutes of Health (NIH)ImpactMandated to conduct research, requiring allocation of resources and scientific expertise.MechanismDirects federal agency to undertake a specific research project.ScaleOperational burden and research focus for the agency.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this study is crucial for understanding potential environmental and health risks associated with high-voltage transmission lines, providing evidence-based information to protect communities and agricultural productivity. They believe it will fill a critical knowledge gap.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that such a study could delay critical energy infrastructure projects, is redundant given existing research on electromagnetic fields, or that the scope is too narrow or broad to yield definitive, actionable results without significant cost.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the public's desire for scientific understanding of potential health and environmental impacts with the ongoing need for expanding and modernizing the electrical grid.

Section 2(b)

Report to Congress

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services, through the NIH Director, to submit a detailed report upon the conclusion of the study mandated in subsection (a). This report, outlining the study's results, must be submitted to the chair and ranking member of four specific congressional committees: the House Committees on Agriculture and Energy and Commerce, and the Senate Committees on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry and Energy and Natural Resources.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this