The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 105·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 3, 2025

Increasing Public Access to Recreation Act

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]
Committees
Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 3, 2025

Bottom line

The bill substantially increases the maximum allowable funding for improving public access to recreational areas on federal lands.

What it actually does

This bill proposes to significantly increase the maximum allowable funding for enhancing public access to recreational areas on Federal land. It amends existing law (title 54, United States Code) to raise the percentage of certain funds that can be used for this purpose from 3 percent to 10 percent, and simultaneously increases the dollar cap from $15,000,000 to $50,000,000. This change would allow federal land management agencies to allocate substantially more resources towards improving and expanding recreational access.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill is crucial for meeting the growing demand for outdoor recreation and ensuring that federal lands remain accessible and well-maintained for all Americans. They contend that the current funding caps are insufficient to address existing infrastructure needs, deferred maintenance, and the expansion of access points, and that increasing these limits will unlock vital resources for enhancing the visitor experience and supporting local economies reliant on outdoor tourism.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while increased access is a laudable goal, significantly raising the funding cap without a clear, dedicated funding source or detailed plans for expenditure could lead to fiscal inefficiencies or divert resources from other critical land management priorities such as conservation, wildlife protection, or fire suppression. They may also raise concerns about the potential environmental impacts of increased visitor numbers if not carefully managed.

The bill text is extremely short and can be read in under a minute, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its direct legislative changes.

Section 2

Increase for Recreational Public Access

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends subsection (c) of section 200306 of title 54, United States Code. It increases the maximum percentage of certain funds that can be used for recreational public access from 3 percent to 10 percent. Concurrently, it raises the maximum dollar amount that can be allocated for this purpose from $15,000,000 to $50,000,000. This change provides federal land management agencies with the authority to direct a significantly larger portion of available funds towards improving and expanding public access to federal recreational areas, such as national parks, forests, and wildlife refuges.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupGeneral Public / Outdoor EnthusiastsImpactPotential for increased and improved access to federal recreational lands, including better trails, facilities, and visitor services.MechanismHigher funding caps allow more resources to be directed to these purposes by federal agencies.ScalePotentially nationwide, impacting all federal recreational lands and the millions of visitors they receive annually.
GroupFederal Land Management Agencies (e.g., National Park Service, Forest Service)ImpactGreater financial resources available for access-related projects, but also increased responsibility for managing higher visitor numbers and potential environmental impacts.MechanismDirect increase in the allowable allocation from existing or future funds, providing more budgetary flexibility.ScaleAffects budgeting, project planning, and operational capacity across various federal land management agencies.
GroupLocal Economies near Federal LandsImpactPotential for increased tourism and visitor spending due to improved access and facilities, boosting local businesses and employment.MechanismEnhanced recreational opportunities attract more visitors, leading to economic activity.ScaleLocalized economic benefits for communities adjacent to federal recreational areas.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this increase is vital to address the growing demand for outdoor recreation and to ensure federal lands remain accessible and well-maintained for current and future generations. They believe the existing caps are outdated and insufficient to cover the costs of necessary improvements and expansions, making this adjustment a practical step towards enhancing public enjoyment of natural resources.

Critics contend

Opponents might contend that while the objective of increased access is positive, a substantial increase in the cap without specific project proposals or a clear, dedicated funding stream could lead to inefficient spending or divert funds from other critical conservation or management priorities within federal land agencies. They may also express concerns about the potential for increased visitor impact on sensitive ecosystems if not carefully managed.

Tradeoffs

This provision navigates the tension between expanding public access to federal lands and ensuring the sustainable management and protection of those natural resources. It also involves a tradeoff between allocating more funds to recreational access versus other potential uses for federal land management budgets, such as wildlife conservation, scientific research, or infrastructure unrelated to visitor access.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this