The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10571·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 24, 2026

Surge to Save Newborns Act

IntroducedHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 24, 2026

Bottom line

The bill creates a new federal grant program to financially support states in expanding and standardizing newborn screening for a range of critical health conditions.

What it actually does

This bill establishes a new federal grant program under the Public Health Service Act to provide financial assistance to states. The grants are intended to support the timely implementation of newborn screening for conditions included on the recommended uniform screening panel. It also appropriates $35 million annually for five fiscal years (2027-2031) for these grants and mandates annual reports to Congress on state implementation progress and grant effectiveness.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill will ensure more newborns receive timely screening for critical conditions, leading to earlier diagnosis and intervention, which can significantly improve health outcomes and save lives. They emphasize the importance of a uniform screening panel to prevent disparities across states and ensure equitable access to life-saving early detection.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that this bill represents an expansion of federal involvement into an area traditionally managed by states, potentially leading to federal overreach or creating dependency on federal funds for state health programs. Some might also raise concerns about the administrative burden of grant applications or the long-term sustainability of programs once federal funding concludes.

The bill is very short and easy to read, allowing ample time for informed evaluation.

Section 2, inserting new Section 330D(a) and (b) into the Public Health Service Act

Establishment of Special Grants for Newborn Screening

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to create a grant program. States or their chief executive officers for health (or their designees) can apply for these grants. The purpose of the grants is to help states quickly implement newborn screening for conditions listed on the recommended uniform screening panel, aiming to standardize and expand screening capabilities nationwide.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupState health agenciesImpactReceive federal funding to enhance public health servicesMechanismGrants to support the implementation and expansion of newborn screening programsScaleSignificant financial support for program development and operation
GroupNewborns and their familiesImpactImproved health outcomes through earlier diagnosis and interventionMechanismTimely screening for a broader range of conditions on the uniform panelScalePotentially all newborns in participating states benefit from enhanced screening

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that federal grants are crucial to help states overcome financial and logistical hurdles in adopting new screening technologies and expanding their panels, ensuring equitable access to life-saving early detection for all newborns.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the concept of newborn screening itself. Potential concerns might revolve around the administrative burden of grant applications for states or the sustainability of programs once federal funding concludes.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the desire for uniform, comprehensive newborn screening across states with state autonomy in public health matters, using federal funding as an incentive to achieve national health goals.

Section 2, inserting new Section 330D(c) into the Public Health Service Act

Annual Reports to Congress

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision requires the Secretary to submit annual reports to Congress from fiscal year 2027 through 2031. These reports must identify, on a state-by-state basis, which specific conditions from the recommended uniform screening panel have not yet been implemented for newborn screening. The reports also need to evaluate the effectiveness of the grant program and offer recommendations for future legislative or administrative actions.

Section 2, inserting new Section 330D(d) into the Public Health Service Act

Funding for Grants

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section explicitly appropriates $35,000,000 from the Treasury for each of fiscal years 2027 through 2031. These funds are specifically designated for the newborn screening grants established by the bill and are made available until expended. This ensures a dedicated funding stream for the program over a five-year period.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this