The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10583·119th Congress·Introduced Sep 24, 2026

Garrett’s Law

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Mullin, Kevin [D-CA-15]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 24, 2026

Bottom line

This bill reclassifies certain high-powered air guns as firearms under federal law, subjecting them to the same regulations as traditional firearms, including licensing, serialization, and record-keeping requirements.

What it actually does

This bill amends chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to expand the definition of "firearm" to include "lethal air guns." It defines lethal air guns based on specific caliber and muzzle velocity thresholds, or by Attorney General designation, excluding paint-filled pellet weapons. The bill sets an effective date 850 days after enactment and requires the Attorney General to publish guidance for manufacturers within 365 days to assist with compliance.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue this bill closes a regulatory loophole that allows dangerous weapons capable of causing death to be unregulated, thereby enhancing public safety by applying federal firearm laws to these devices. They emphasize the lethal potential of certain air guns and the necessity of preventing their misuse, with the short title "Garrett's Law" suggesting a specific incident or victim motivates the legislation.

Opponents contend

Opponents may argue that classifying air guns as firearms is an overreach of federal authority, potentially infringing on the rights of responsible owners and criminalizing common recreational equipment. They might contend that existing laws are sufficient or that the definition is overly broad, impacting legitimate sporting or hunting activities and imposing undue burdens on manufacturers and retailers.

The bill is very short and straightforward to read, allowing ample time for public consideration before its delayed effective date.

Section 2(a)(1)

Amending the Definition of "Firearm"

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision modifies paragraph (3) of section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, to explicitly include "any lethal air gun" within the federal definition of a "firearm." This means that lethal air guns would be subject to all federal laws and regulations that apply to firearms, such as those concerning manufacturing, dealing, possession by prohibited persons, and interstate commerce.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupManufacturers of lethal air gunsImpactIncreased regulatory burden, requiring Federal Firearms License (FFL)MechanismScale
GroupRetailers of lethal air gunsImpactIncreased regulatory burden, requiring FFL, background checks for salesMechanismScale
GroupOwners of lethal air gunsImpactSubject to federal firearm laws (e.g., restrictions on possession by prohibited persons, potential state/local registration requirements if applicable to firearms)MechanismScale
GroupGeneral publicImpactPotential increase in public safety due to stricter regulation of lethal air gunsMechanismScale

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this reclassification is essential for public safety, as certain air guns possess lethal capabilities comparable to traditional firearms and should therefore be regulated similarly to prevent their misuse in crimes.

Critics contend

Critics contend that this reclassification is an overreach, as air guns are distinct from firearms and should not be subjected to the same stringent regulations, which could unduly burden law-abiding citizens and legitimate recreational activities.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the perceived need for increased public safety through regulation against concerns about potential burdens on manufacturers, retailers, and owners of air guns, and the scope of federal authority over such devices.

Section 2(a)(2)

Defining "Lethal Air Gun"

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section adds a new paragraph (39) to 18 U.S.C. 921(a) defining "lethal air gun." It specifies that a lethal air gun is any weapon (excluding paint-filled pellet guns) that expels a pellet via air or gas pressure, meeting certain caliber and muzzle velocity thresholds (e.g., .177 caliber at 800+ fps, .22 caliber at 500+ fps, .25 caliber at 450+ fps), or any metallic pellet above .25 caliber. The Attorney General is also granted rulemaking authority to designate other weapons as lethal air guns if capable of causing death.

Section 2(b)

Delayed Effective Date

mentioned in summarystraightforward

The amendments made by this Act will take effect 850 days after the date of its enactment. This provides a significant grace period for manufacturers, retailers, and owners to understand and comply with the new federal regulations before they become enforceable.

Section 2(c)

Guidance for Manufacturers

mentioned in summarystraightforward

Within 365 days of enactment, the Attorney General is required to publish guidance, including on their website, to assist manufacturers of lethal air guns in becoming Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs). This guidance must cover the application process and compliance with requirements such as serialization and record-keeping.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this