The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10645·119th Congress·Introduced Oct 1, 2026

SMART Act

IntroducedHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Oct 1, 2026

Bottom line

The SMART Act aims to bolster Medicaid program integrity by requiring the federal government to equip states with advanced, standardized data analytics tools to detect and prevent fraud, waste, and abuse, potentially leading to significant cost savings and improved program efficiency.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to provide states with standardized data analytic technologies to identify and prevent fraud, waste, and abuse within their Medicaid programs. These technologies must be interoperable with existing state systems and enable states to review risk indicators, access analytic outputs, use investigative tools, and receive multi-state alerts. HHS is also required to establish risk indicators based on data from multiple federal health care programs and report annually on the technologies' utilization and impact.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill is a critical step towards safeguarding taxpayer dollars by providing states with modern, effective tools to combat sophisticated fraud schemes in Medicaid. They contend it will lead to substantial cost savings, ensure resources are directed to legitimate patient care, and improve the overall financial integrity and sustainability of the Medicaid program.

Opponents contend

Opponents might raise concerns about potential federal overreach into state-administered programs, arguing that a one-size-fits-all federal technology mandate may not adequately address the unique needs or existing infrastructure of individual states. They might also question the cost-effectiveness of developing and deploying new federal systems compared to enhancing existing state-led efforts, or raise data privacy concerns related to centralized data analysis.

The bill is very concise and clearly written, making it accessible for a quick and thorough understanding of its provisions.

Section 2, amending Section 1903 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b)

Mandating Standardized Data Analytic Technologies for Medicaid Program Integrity

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to make standardized data analytic technologies available to all states within 180 days of the bill's enactment. These technologies are designed to identify and prevent fraud, waste, and abuse in state Medicaid programs. They must be interoperable with existing state systems, allow states to review risk indicators, access datasets, use investigative tools, receive multi-state alerts, conduct state-specific analyses, and integrate outputs into their program integrity activities. HHS is also required to establish risk indicators based on billing, utilization, and enrollment data across multiple states or federal programs.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupState Medicaid agenciesImpactIncreased capacity for fraud detection and preventionMechanismProvision of federal data analytic tools and technical assistanceScaleSystemic improvement across all state Medicaid programs
GroupMedicaid providers and suppliersImpactIncreased scrutiny and detection of improper billing/utilizationMechanismEnhanced data analysis identifying suspicious patternsScalePotentially higher rates of audits or investigations for those engaging in fraud, waste, or abuse
GroupFederal and state taxpayersImpactPotential savings from reduced fraud, waste, and abuseMechanismMore efficient identification and recovery of overpaymentsScaleSignificant, depending on the effectiveness of the technologies

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision is crucial for safeguarding taxpayer dollars by equipping states with modern tools to combat sophisticated fraud schemes in Medicaid, leading to substantial cost savings and ensuring resources are directed to legitimate patient care.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that mandating federal technologies could impose undue burdens on states, potentially requiring significant integration efforts and diverting resources from other state-specific program integrity initiatives, or that existing state systems are already adequate and a federal mandate could disrupt effective local solutions.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the federal interest in program integrity and cost savings with state autonomy in managing Medicaid programs. It also involves the tradeoff between the upfront investment in new technologies and the potential long-term savings from fraud reduction, alongside the challenge of ensuring effective interoperability across diverse state IT systems.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this