The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10646·119th Congress·Introduced Oct 1, 2026

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Defense to enter into intergovernmental support agreements on behalf of Defense Agencies, and for other purposes.

IntroducedArmed Forces and National SecuritySubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Beatty, Joyce [D-OH-3]
Committees
Armed Services Committee (primary)
Last action
Oct 1, 2026

Bottom line

The bill expands the authority to use intergovernmental support agreements for installation services to include Defense Agencies, aiming for greater efficiency and flexibility.

What it actually does

This bill amends title 10, United States Code, to allow the Secretary of Defense to enter into intergovernmental support agreements (IGSAs) on behalf of Defense Agencies. Currently, only the Secretaries of military departments are explicitly authorized to enter into such agreements with State or local governments for installation support services. This change expands the definition of 'Secretary concerned' within the relevant statute to include the Secretary of Defense when acting for a Defense Agency.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill will enhance the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of Defense Agencies by enabling them to leverage intergovernmental support agreements for various installation services. They contend it will streamline the procurement process, reduce administrative burdens, and foster better collaboration between federal agencies and local governments, ultimately leading to better service delivery and potential cost savings for taxpayers.

Opponents contend

Critics might express concerns that expanding this authority could lead to a lack of centralized oversight if not properly managed, potentially resulting in less transparent or less efficient agreements. They may also argue it could divert resources or attention from the core missions of Defense Agencies, or that it could negatively impact private sector contractors who currently provide these services, potentially leading to job losses in that sector.

The bill is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for a quick read and understanding of its core purpose.

Section 1, page 1, lines 7-10

Expansion of Intergovernmental Support Agreement Authority

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends Section 2679(f) of title 10, United States Code, which defines terms related to intergovernmental support agreements (IGSAs). Specifically, it adds a new paragraph (5) stating that the term 'Secretary concerned' includes the Secretary of Defense when acting on behalf of the head of a Defense Agency. This means that Defense Agencies, under the authority of the Secretary of Defense, will now be able to enter into agreements with State or local governments for installation support services, a power previously limited to military departments.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupDefense AgenciesImpactIncreased flexibility and potential for efficiencyMechanismAuthorization to enter into IGSAs for installation support services.ScaleBroad, affecting all Defense Agencies requiring installation support.
GroupState and local governmentsImpactNew opportunities for partnership and revenueMechanismAbility to provide installation support services to Defense Agencies through IGSAs.ScalePotentially significant for communities hosting Defense Agency facilities.
GroupPrivate sector contractorsImpactPotential for reduced contract opportunitiesMechanismServices previously provided by contractors may now be sourced through IGSAs.ScaleLocalized, depending on the specific services and agencies involved.

Supporters argue

Proponents argue this expansion will allow Defense Agencies to procure essential installation support services more efficiently and cost-effectively, mirroring the benefits already realized by military departments. They believe it will reduce bureaucratic hurdles and foster beneficial partnerships with local communities.

Critics contend

Opponents might contend that this expansion could lead to a decrease in competitive bidding for services, potentially disadvantaging private sector businesses that currently provide these services. They may also raise concerns about the potential for inconsistent oversight across various Defense Agencies if not managed centrally.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire for increased efficiency and flexibility for Defense Agencies against potential impacts on private sector competition and the need for robust oversight of intergovernmental agreements.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this