The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10652·119th Congress·Introduced Oct 1, 2026

San Gabriel Basin Restoration Fund Reauthorization Act

IntroducedEnvironmental ProtectionSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Cisneros, Gilbert Ray [D-CA-31]
Committees
Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Oct 1, 2026

Bottom line

This bill extends and significantly expands federal financial authorization for critical water restoration efforts in the San Gabriel Basin, ensuring long-term funding and operational flexibility for essential projects.

What it actually does

This bill reauthorizes the San Gabriel Basin Restoration Fund by removing a 10-year operational funding limit for certain projects and increasing the total authorized appropriation from $146.2 million to $250 million. These changes ensure continued federal support for critical water quality and supply projects in the San Gabriel Basin, allowing for long-term remediation efforts.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this reauthorization is crucial for the long-term health and sustainability of the San Gabriel Basin's water resources, providing necessary funding to continue vital cleanup and restoration projects that ensure a safe and reliable water supply for the region. They emphasize the importance of removing the 10-year limit to allow for the completion of complex, multi-decade environmental remediation efforts that cannot be effectively addressed within a shorter timeframe.

Opponents contend

Critics, if any, might argue against the increased federal spending, suggesting that local or state entities should bear a greater share of the financial responsibility for regional water projects, or that the federal government's role should be limited to initial startup funding rather than ongoing operational support. However, given the nature of environmental remediation and public health concerns, direct opposition to the fund itself is less common.

The bill is exceptionally short and can be read in under a minute, making it highly accessible for public review and evaluation.

Section 2(1)

Removal of Time Limit for Project Funding

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision eliminates a previous restriction that limited federal funding for certain projects within the San Gabriel Basin Restoration Fund to a maximum of 10 years following their initial date of operation. By striking this time limit, the bill allows projects, particularly those involving long-term water treatment and remediation, to receive sustained federal support beyond a decade, ensuring their continued operation and effectiveness.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupSan Gabriel Basin Water Agencies and OperatorsImpactContinued operational funding and planning certaintyMechanismRemoval of statutory time limit on federal financial assistance for eligible projects.ScaleEnsures long-term viability and uninterrupted operation of ongoing water treatment and supply projects.
GroupResidents and Businesses in San Gabriel BasinImpactContinued access to safe and reliable water supplyMechanismSustained funding for water quality and supply infrastructure and remediation efforts.ScaleBenefits millions of residents and numerous businesses reliant on the basin's water resources.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that complex environmental remediation and water management projects often require sustained effort beyond an arbitrary 10-year limit to achieve and maintain desired outcomes. Removing this restriction ensures that critical infrastructure, such as groundwater treatment plants, can operate and maintain effectiveness for as long as needed to protect public health and water security.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against extending funding for established environmental remediation projects, especially when they address public health and safety concerns. However, some might generally question the duration of federal involvement in local projects, advocating for clearer exit strategies.

Tradeoffs

The tradeoff involves balancing the desire for finite federal commitments against the practical reality that environmental contamination and water management challenges can be long-term, requiring sustained investment to achieve and maintain desired outcomes for public health and safety.

Section 2(2)

Increase in Total Authorized Funding

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision raises the total amount authorized to be appropriated for the San Gabriel Basin Restoration Fund from $146,200,000 to $250,000,000. This significant increase provides additional federal financial capacity to support ongoing and future projects aimed at cleaning up contaminated groundwater and improving water supply reliability within the San Gabriel Basin, reflecting updated cost estimates and expanded needs.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this