The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10659·119th Congress·Introduced Oct 1, 2026

Removing Access Barriers to Running for Elected Office for People with Disabilities Act

IntroducedSocial WelfareSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Dean, Madeleine [D-PA-4]
Committees
Oversight and Government Reform Committee (primary)
Last action
Oct 1, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to remove a financial disincentive for individuals with disabilities to seek elected office by ensuring their campaign activities do not jeopardize their essential federal benefits.

What it actually does

This bill mandates that any campaign work performed by an individual with a disability who receives federal benefits, and any compensation received for such work, must be disregarded when determining their eligibility for or the amount of benefits under any federal program or federally-funded state or local program. It defines 'campaign work' as being a candidate for elected federal, state, or local office, and a 'qualified individual' as someone receiving Social Security disability benefits.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill removes a significant barrier to political participation for people with disabilities, promoting inclusivity and ensuring that individuals with lived experience of disability can represent their communities without fear of losing vital support. They contend it levels the playing field, allowing disabled candidates the same opportunities as non-disabled candidates to engage in the democratic process.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while the intent is laudable, this bill could create a precedent where campaign work is treated differently from other forms of work or income for benefit recipients, potentially leading to questions of fairness or unintended consequences regarding the definition of 'work' for disability benefits. Some might also raise concerns about the administrative burden of distinguishing campaign work from other activities.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, making it very accessible for a quick read and understanding.

Section 2(a) and 2(b)

Disregarding Campaign Work and Compensation for Benefit Eligibility

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that for individuals receiving federal disability benefits under the Social Security Act, any work they perform as a candidate for elected federal, state, or local office, along with any money they earn from such work, will not be counted when determining if they are eligible for or how much they receive from federal or federally-funded state/local benefit programs. This ensures that running for office does not cause them to lose their disability benefits.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupIndividuals with disabilities receiving Title II or XVI Social Security benefitsImpactPositive, removes a financial barrier to political participation.MechanismExempts campaign work and compensation from benefit eligibility calculations.ScaleAffects all qualified individuals nationwide who might consider running for office.
GroupFederal, State, and local electoral processesImpactPositive, promotes greater inclusivity and representation.MechanismEncourages more diverse candidates to run for office.ScaleBroad impact on democratic participation.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision directly addresses a systemic barrier that has historically prevented many talented individuals with disabilities from seeking public office. By safeguarding their benefits, it empowers them to participate fully in democracy and bring valuable perspectives to legislative bodies.

Critics contend

No specific organized opposition is typically raised against the core principle of removing barriers for people with disabilities. However, some might express general concerns about the precedent of exempting specific types of 'work' from benefit calculations, potentially opening the door for other exemptions or complicating benefit administration.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the goal of encouraging political participation for people with disabilities against the administrative complexities of federal benefit programs, which are designed to assess work capacity and income. It prioritizes civic engagement over strict adherence to traditional income-counting rules for a specific, limited activity.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this