The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10722·119th Congress·Introduced Oct 5, 2026

9–8–8 Crisis Response Workforce Act

IntroducedHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Carter, Troy A. [D-LA-2]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Oct 5, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to bolster the national behavioral health workforce, with a specific focus on staffing and improving crisis response services, including the 9-8-8 suicide and crisis lifeline.

What it actually does

This bill expands federal programs to address the shortage of behavioral health professionals, particularly those specializing in crisis management services. It mandates data collection on crisis response availability in underserved areas, broadens a minority fellowship program to include crisis management training, and expands the Behavioral Health Workforce Education and Training (BHWET) program to cover crisis management and remote practicum options, while authorizing new appropriations for these initiatives.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that the bill is crucial for strengthening the nation's behavioral health infrastructure, especially in light of the 9-8-8 crisis lifeline. They contend that expanding training programs and collecting vital data will ensure that individuals experiencing mental health crises receive timely and appropriate care, particularly in underserved communities, and will help address workforce shortages and improve diversity within the profession.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while the goals are laudable, the authorized appropriations may be insufficient to address the scale of the behavioral health workforce crisis. Concerns could also be raised about the administrative burden of new data collection requirements or the effectiveness of remote practicum programs in preparing professionals for complex crisis situations.

The bill is concise and straightforward, allowing an informed reader to understand its provisions and implications within the typical timeframe for legislative review.

Section 2(a)

National Health Service Corps Data Collection on Crisis Services

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Public Health Service Act to require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to collect and publish data. This data will compare the availability and need for crisis response services, such as crisis call centers, mobile crisis units, and stabilization facilities, in health professional shortage areas. It will also track the number of behavioral health professionals working in these crisis settings.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupHealth Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs)ImpactPotential for improved resource allocationMechanismData collection will highlight gaps and needs, informing future policy and funding decisions.ScaleNational, focused on underserved areas
GroupBehavioral health professionalsImpactIncreased visibility of workforce needsMechanismData will quantify the demand for crisis management specialists.ScaleNational
GroupIndividuals experiencing mental health crisesImpactImproved access to servicesMechanismBetter data can lead to more targeted interventions and service expansion.ScaleLocal to regional within HPSAs

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that robust data collection is a fundamental step toward effectively addressing the behavioral health crisis. By identifying specific gaps in crisis response services and workforce in underserved areas, policymakers can make informed decisions to allocate resources more efficiently and improve outcomes.

Critics contend

Some might argue that while data collection is valuable, it can be an administrative burden if not directly tied to immediate action. Concerns could also be raised about the cost of data collection without a direct appropriation for its implementation.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between the need for comprehensive data to inform policy and the potential for administrative overhead. While data is essential, its collection must be efficient and lead to actionable insights to justify the effort.

Section 2(b)

Minority Fellowship Program Expansion for Crisis Management

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section expands the existing Minority Fellowship Pilot Program to specifically include training for mental and substance use disorder treatment professionals in crisis management services. This means fellowships can now be awarded for postbaccalaureate training in fields like psychiatry, social work, and psychology, with a focus on roles within crisis call centers, mobile crisis teams, or crisis receiving and stabilization facilities. It also authorizes $10 million annually for fiscal years 2027 through 2031 specifically for these crisis management fellowships.

Section 2(c)

Behavioral Health Workforce Education and Training (BHWET) Program Expansion

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This part of the bill significantly expands the BHWET program. It allows for remote practicum hours in training programs and explicitly includes training for mental health crisis line responders (call, text, chat). It also adds 'crisis management' as a key focus area for various grants, encompassing training for roles in crisis call centers, mobile crisis teams, and stabilization programs. Furthermore, it authorizes an additional $10 million annually for fiscal years 2027 through 2031 specifically for crisis workforce development within the BHWET program, on top of existing reauthorizations.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this