The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10752·119th Congress·Introduced Oct 6, 2026

CISA Securing AI Task Force Act

IntroducedArmed Forces and National SecuritySubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Carter, Troy A. [D-LA-2]
Committees
Homeland Security Committee (primary)
Last action
Oct 6, 2026

Bottom line

This bill creates a dedicated, temporary task force within CISA to centralize and enhance the agency's efforts in securing artificial intelligence and utilizing AI for cybersecurity.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the establishment of a Task Force within the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) of the Department of Homeland Security. The Task Force is charged with coordinating CISA's activities related to the safety and security of artificial intelligence, including its secure design, development, adoption, and deployment, and leveraging AI to defend against cyber threats. It also requires biannual briefings to Congress and includes a five-year sunset clause.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that establishing a dedicated AI Task Force within CISA is a crucial and proactive measure to address the rapidly evolving risks and opportunities presented by artificial intelligence. They contend it ensures a coordinated federal strategy to protect critical infrastructure, advise stakeholders on emerging threats, and leverage AI's defensive capabilities, preventing a fragmented approach to a critical national security issue.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that creating a new task force could introduce unnecessary bureaucratic layers within CISA, potentially duplicating efforts or slowing down the agency's ability to respond agilely to technological changes. They may contend that CISA's existing structures and mandates are sufficient to integrate AI security considerations without the need for a separate, time-limited entity.

The bill is very concise and can be read and understood quickly, allowing ample time for a thorough evaluation of its provisions.

Section 2(a)

Establishment of CISA AI Task Force

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to establish a Task Force within one year of the bill's enactment. This Task Force will be comprised of personnel from across CISA's offices and divisions, with the primary goal of coordinating the agency's activities related to the safety and security of artificial intelligence, both internally and in its contributions to Department-wide initiatives.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)ImpactOrganizational restructuring and enhanced focus on AI security.MechanismCreation of a new internal task force.ScaleAgency-wide operational change.
GroupDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS)ImpactImproved coordination and alignment of AI security initiatives.MechanismCISA's task force contributing to DHS-wide efforts.ScaleDepartment-level strategic alignment.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that a dedicated task force is essential to centralize expertise and ensure a cohesive strategy for addressing the complex and rapidly evolving challenges and opportunities presented by AI within CISA's critical mission.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that CISA already possesses the mandate and existing organizational structures to integrate AI security into its operations, and that a new task force could lead to redundancy or slow down agile responses.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the need for focused, dedicated attention to AI security with the potential for creating new bureaucratic structures that might overlap with existing responsibilities or become less agile over time.

Section 2(a)(1)-(10)

Mandated Activities of the Task Force

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section outlines ten specific duties for the CISA AI Task Force. These responsibilities include coordinating efforts for secure AI design and deployment, providing CISA's input to interagency groups, assessing existing CISA initiatives for AI relevance, identifying how AI can defend against cyber threats, advising stakeholders on AI-related cyber risks, addressing CISA's internal AI workforce gaps, promoting the adoption of secure AI software, recommending new initiatives, ensuring privacy and civil liberties standards are met, and supporting CISA's AI use inventory.

Section 2(b) and 2(c)

Biannual Briefings and Sunset Clause

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the CISA AI Task Force to provide biannual briefings to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate. These briefings are to commence six months after the Task Force's establishment and continue every six months thereafter. Additionally, the Act includes a sunset clause, stipulating that the entire Act will cease to be in effect five years after its date of enactment, effectively dissolving the Task Force at that time.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this