Technical corrections only. The changes between v1 and v2 are cosmetic, primarily reflecting the bill's progression through the House, including the addition of sponsors and committee reporting details. There are no substantive policy changes to the legislative text.
STEAM Act
- Sponsor
- Rep. Lee, Susie [D-NV-3]
- Committees
- Natural Resources Committee (primary)
- Last action
- May 20, 2026
Bottom line
The STEAM Act aims to accelerate geothermal energy development by applying existing expedited environmental review processes, previously reserved for oil and gas, to geothermal projects in areas already subject to environmental analysis or development.
What it actually does
This bill, known as the STEAM Act, amends the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to extend expedited environmental review processes under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to geothermal exploration and development projects. Currently, these expedited reviews apply to oil and gas projects in areas that have been previously studied or developed. The bill specifically adds references to the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to ensure geothermal projects benefit from the same streamlined NEPA procedures.
Proponents argue
Supporters argue that this bill will significantly accelerate the deployment of geothermal energy, a clean and renewable power source, by reducing bureaucratic hurdles and permitting delays. They contend that applying existing expedited review processes to geothermal projects in areas already disturbed or studied is a common-sense approach that will help meet renewable energy goals and enhance energy independence without compromising environmental standards in new, pristine areas.
Opponents contend
Opponents might argue that while promoting renewable energy is important, streamlining environmental reviews, even in previously studied areas, could lead to insufficient oversight of potential environmental impacts. They may raise concerns about the cumulative effects of development, potential impacts on local ecosystems, water resources, or indigenous cultural sites, suggesting that a thorough NEPA review is always necessary regardless of prior activity.
The bill is very short and can be read quickly, allowing ample time for a detailed understanding of its specific amendment.
Section 2, amending Section 390 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15942)
Expedited NEPA Review for Geothermal Projects
This provision expands the scope of expedited environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to include geothermal exploration and development. Specifically, it amends Section 390 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which currently allows for streamlined NEPA processes for oil and gas projects in areas that have been previously studied, developed, or disturbed. By adding geothermal resources to this section, the bill aims to reduce the time and complexity associated with obtaining permits for geothermal projects in similar areas.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that this provision is crucial for unlocking the full potential of geothermal energy by removing unnecessary delays. They emphasize that the expedited review applies only to areas already studied or developed, minimizing new environmental risks while maximizing the efficiency of renewable energy deployment. This will help the nation achieve its clean energy goals faster.
Critics contend
Critics might contend that even in previously studied or developed areas, geothermal projects can have unique environmental footprints, such as impacts on groundwater, seismic activity, or local ecosystems. They argue that a full NEPA review ensures all potential impacts are thoroughly assessed, and streamlining this process could lead to unforeseen consequences or inadequate mitigation measures.
Tradeoffs
The provision balances the desire to accelerate renewable energy development and reduce regulatory burdens against concerns about maintaining robust environmental protections and ensuring comprehensive impact assessments, even in areas with prior development.