The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 10913·119th Congress·Introduced Oct 26, 2026

Eliminating Dangerous Preservatives Act

IntroducedHealthMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Oct 26, 2026

Bottom line

This bill bans three common synthetic food preservatives, BHA, BHT, and TBHQ, from human food products sold in interstate commerce, with a two-year implementation period for manufacturers to reformulate products.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to classify food intended for human consumption as adulterated if it contains butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), or tert-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ). It establishes a two-year grace period for compliance, mandates the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue implementing regulations, and requires a report to Congress on implementation and any further recommendations.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue these preservatives have potential health risks, citing studies that suggest endocrine disruption, carcinogenicity, or other adverse effects. They contend that removing these substances will improve public health and encourage food manufacturers to use safer alternatives or natural preservatives, aligning with consumer demand for cleaner food labels.

Opponents contend

Opponents may argue that these preservatives are currently deemed safe by regulatory bodies at approved levels and are crucial for extending shelf life, preventing spoilage, and maintaining food quality, especially for affordable processed foods. They might also raise concerns about the significant economic burden on manufacturers for reformulation and potential increases in food waste or costs for consumers.

The bill is very short and uses clear language, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its core provisions quickly.

Section 2(a)

Food Containing Certain Preservatives Adulterated

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to classify any food intended for human consumption as 'adulterated' if it contains butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), or tert-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ). This effectively prohibits the use of these three synthetic preservatives in the U.S. food supply for human consumption.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFood manufacturersImpactRegulatory burden, reformulation costs, potential supply chain disruptionMechanismLegal prohibition on specific ingredientsScaleIndustry-wide for products containing these preservatives
GroupConsumersImpactPotential health benefits, changes in food product availability/cost/shelf lifeMechanismRemoval of specific preservatives from foodScaleWidespread
GroupFood and Drug Administration (FDA)ImpactIncreased regulatory and enforcement responsibilitiesMechanismMandate to issue regulations and enforce new adulteration standardScaleSignificant

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that these preservatives have been linked to health concerns in various studies, including potential endocrine disruption, carcinogenicity, and other adverse effects, and their removal is a necessary step to protect public health and align with evolving scientific understanding.

Critics contend

Critics contend that these preservatives are currently approved by the FDA as safe for use at specified levels and are vital for preventing spoilage, maintaining food quality, and extending shelf life, especially for processed foods, and that a ban could lead to increased food waste or higher costs without clear public health gains.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances potential public health benefits from removing controversial additives against potential economic costs for food manufacturers, possible impacts on food affordability and shelf life, and the ongoing scientific debate over the safety of these substances at current approved levels.

Section 2(b) and 2(c)

Implementation Timeline and Regulatory Mandate

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision establishes a two-year grace period from the date of enactment before the ban on the specified preservatives takes effect for food introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce. It also mandates that the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Commissioner of Food and Drugs (FDA), issue regulations to implement this amendment within two years of enactment.

Section 2(d)

Congressional Report on Implementation and Recommendations

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to submit a report to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions within three years of the bill's enactment. The report must detail the implementation of the ban, including efforts by food manufacturers to reformulate food, and provide any recommendations for further legislative or regulatory action regarding these preservatives.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this