The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 1285·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 13, 2025

Water Infrastructure Subcontractor and Taxpayer Protection Act of 2025

IntroducedWater Resources DevelopmentSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12]
Committees
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 13, 2025

Bottom line

The bill aims to protect subcontractors, suppliers, and taxpayers by ensuring financial safeguards are in place for federally supported water infrastructure projects, requiring contractors to guarantee project completion and payment.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) of 2014 to mandate payment and performance security for all construction projects receiving WIFIA assistance. It allows state or local security requirements to be used if they cover at least 50 percent of the total construction contract amount; otherwise, federal bonding requirements, similar to those under the Miller Act, will apply.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill closes a critical loophole in WIFIA, ensuring that subcontractors and suppliers on large water infrastructure projects are protected against non-payment and that taxpayers are not left to cover costs if a prime contractor defaults. They emphasize that these payment and performance security requirements are standard practice in federal contracting and are essential for safeguarding public funds and supporting small businesses.

Opponents contend

Opponents might contend that imposing additional federal requirements could increase the administrative burden and overall costs for WIFIA-funded projects, potentially slowing down the delivery of critical water infrastructure. They may also argue that existing state and local laws are often sufficient, and that a federal mandate could interfere with local procurement flexibility or deter some entities from seeking WIFIA financing.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, allowing for a very quick and complete understanding of its provisions and intent.

Section 2, amending Section 5028(a)(1)(C) of the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3907(a)(1)(C))

Mandatory Payment and Performance Security for WIFIA-Assisted Projects

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires that all construction projects receiving financial assistance under the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) must have payment and performance security. This typically means contractors must provide bonds guaranteeing that they will complete the project as agreed (performance bond) and pay their subcontractors and suppliers (payment bond). The bill specifies that if applicable state or local law already requires such security for at least 50 percent of the total construction contract amount, those requirements can be used. Otherwise, federal bonding standards, similar to those outlined in the Miller Act (40 U.S.C. 3131(b)), will be enforced.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupSubcontractors and suppliers on WIFIA-funded projectsImpactIncreased financial protection against non-payment or contractor default, ensuring they are paid for their work and materials.MechanismMandated payment bonds provide a financial guarantee that subcontractors and suppliers will be paid.ScaleApplies to all future WIFIA-funded construction projects.
GroupProject sponsors (state and local governments, utilities) receiving WIFIA loansImpactPotentially increased administrative burden and project costs due to the requirement to secure and manage bonds.MechanismCompliance with federal or enhanced state/local security requirements, which may involve additional paperwork and fees.ScaleApplies to all future WIFIA-funded construction projects.
GroupFederal taxpayersImpactReduced risk of federal funds being used for incomplete projects or projects with unresolved payment disputes, safeguarding public investment.MechanismPerformance bonds ensure project completion, while payment bonds reduce the likelihood of liens or legal challenges that could delay projects or increase costs.ScaleIndirect benefit across all WIFIA projects, protecting federal financial interests.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this provision is crucial for protecting small businesses, such as subcontractors and material suppliers, from financial hardship if a prime contractor defaults or fails to pay. They also contend that it safeguards taxpayer investments by ensuring that projects funded with federal assistance are completed on time and within budget, minimizing the risk of unfinished work or costly legal disputes.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that mandating additional federal security requirements, particularly when state or local laws already exist, could introduce unnecessary bureaucracy and increase the overall cost of WIFIA projects. They may suggest that these added costs could ultimately be passed on to ratepayers or taxpayers, or that the requirements could deter some eligible entities from pursuing WIFIA funding due to increased complexity.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the desire to provide robust financial protection for subcontractors and federal investments against the potential for increased project costs and administrative burdens for WIFIA recipients. It also navigates the tension between establishing a uniform federal standard and deferring to existing state and local regulatory frameworks.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this