The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 1288·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 13, 2025

DRIVE Act of 2025

IntroducedArmed Forces and National SecuritySubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Brownley, Julia [D-CA-26]
Committees
Veterans' Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 11, 2025

Bottom line

The DRIVE Act aims to ensure veterans are adequately reimbursed for travel to VA medical appointments and receive those reimbursements in a timely manner.

What it actually does

This bill, the 'DRIVE Act of 2025,' amends title 38, United States Code, to increase the mileage reimbursement rate for veterans using the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Beneficiary Travel program. It mandates that the VA's mileage rate must be equal to or greater than the rate set by the Administrator of General Services for federal employees using private vehicles for official business. Additionally, it requires the VA to process and pay these mileage allowances within 90 days of a properly submitted request.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that increasing the mileage reimbursement rate is essential to ensure veterans, especially those in rural areas or with limited incomes, are not financially penalized for seeking necessary medical care. They contend that the current rate may not cover the true cost of fuel, vehicle wear and tear, and other expenses, creating a barrier to access. Timely payments are also crucial to prevent financial hardship for veterans relying on these reimbursements.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while the intent is good, increasing the mileage rate could significantly increase VA expenditures, potentially diverting funds from other critical veteran services or contributing to the national deficit. They might also raise concerns about the administrative burden of adjusting rates and ensuring compliance with the 90-day payment window, especially for a large program like Beneficiary Travel.

The bill is very short and easy to read, allowing ample time for a thorough evaluation of its provisions.

Section 2(a), amending subsection (g) of section 111 of title 38

Mandating GSA Mileage Rate for VA Beneficiary Travel

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to set its mileage reimbursement rate for veterans' health-related travel at a level equal to or higher than the rate the General Services Administration (GSA) sets for federal employees using their personal vehicles for official business. Currently, the bill text notes a rate of 41.5 cents per mile, which this amendment replaces with the GSA-determined rate.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupVeterans utilizing the VA Beneficiary Travel programImpactPositive financial impact through increased reimbursement for travel expensesMechanismDirect increase in the per-mile payment rateScaleAffects all veterans eligible for the program, particularly those with frequent or long-distance travel needs
GroupDepartment of Veterans Affairs (VA)ImpactIncreased administrative and budgetary costsMechanismHigher payouts for mileage reimbursementsScalePotentially significant increase in overall program expenditure

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that aligning the VA's mileage rate with the GSA rate ensures fair compensation for veterans, reflecting the actual costs of fuel, maintenance, and vehicle depreciation. This helps remove financial barriers to accessing critical healthcare, especially for veterans in remote areas or those with mobility challenges.

Critics contend

Opponents might contend that while fair compensation is important, mandating a specific rate tied to GSA could lead to unpredictable and potentially substantial increases in VA spending, which might strain the VA budget or necessitate cuts elsewhere. They might also argue that the GSA rate, while appropriate for federal employees, may not perfectly align with the specific needs or financial models of the VA's beneficiary travel program.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension is between ensuring adequate financial support for veterans' healthcare access and managing the budgetary implications for the VA.

Section 2(b), adding new paragraph (5) to subsection (b) of section 111 of title 38

90-Day Payment Window for Beneficiary Travel Allowances

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision requires the VA to pay mileage allowances under the Beneficiary Travel program within 90 days of a veteran properly submitting a request. This aims to prevent delays in reimbursement, ensuring veterans receive their funds in a reasonable timeframe.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this