The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 1363·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 14, 2025

Honor and Remember Flag Recognition Act

IntroducedArmed Forces and National SecuritySubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Davis, Donald G. [D-NC-1]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 14, 2025

Bottom line

This bill establishes a national symbol and display requirements to officially honor members of the U.S. Armed Forces who made the ultimate sacrifice in the line of duty.

What it actually does

This bill designates the Honor and Remember Flag, created by Honor and Remember, Inc., as an official national symbol to recognize and honor members of the U.S. Armed Forces who died in the line of duty. It mandates the display of this flag at numerous federal locations, including the Capitol, White House, national memorials, military installations, VA medical centers, and USPS post offices, on specific patriotic holidays and continuously at certain sites.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill provides long-overdue national recognition for fallen service members, offering a unified and visible symbol of remembrance and gratitude for their ultimate sacrifice. They believe it ensures that the sacrifices of these heroes are consistently honored across the nation.

Opponents contend

While acknowledging the laudable sentiment, critics might argue against mandating a specific private organization's flag as an official national symbol, suggesting it could set a precedent for other groups or that a more generic, government-designed symbol might be more appropriate. Concerns may also be raised about the unquantified costs for procurement and widespread display across numerous federal facilities.

The bill is exceptionally short and written in clear language, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 2(b), adding Section 904(a) to title 36, United States Code

Official Designation of the Honor and Remember Flag

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision formally designates the Honor and Remember Flag, created by Honor and Remember, Inc., as the official symbol representing the nation's concern and commitment to honoring and remembering the lives of all U.S. Armed Forces members who have lost their lives in the line of duty. This establishes a singular, recognized emblem for this specific purpose under federal law.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFamilies of fallen service membersImpactProvides a recognized national symbol of remembrance and honor for their loved ones' sacrifice.MechanismOfficial designation by federal law.ScaleNational
GroupGeneral publicImpactIncreased awareness and a visible, consistent symbol of the sacrifices made by fallen service members.MechanismPublic display mandates following official designation.ScaleNational
GroupHonor and Remember, Inc.ImpactTheir flag design receives official national recognition and endorsement.MechanismDirect designation in federal law.ScaleOrganizational

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this designation provides a much-needed, consistent national symbol to honor the profound sacrifice of fallen service members, ensuring their memory is visibly and officially recognized across the country.

Critics contend

Critics might raise concerns about designating a flag created by a specific private organization, suggesting it could create a precedent for other groups seeking official symbols or that a more generic, government-designed symbol might be more appropriate to avoid perceived favoritism.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between the desire to provide a specific, meaningful symbol for fallen heroes and the potential implications of officially endorsing a design from a private entity over a more universally developed or government-created emblem.

Section 2(b), adding Section 904(b) and (c) to title 36, United States Code

Mandated Display at Federal Locations and Specific Days

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates the display of the newly designated Honor and Remember Flag at numerous federal locations, including the Capitol, White House, national memorials (WWII, Korean War, Vietnam Veterans), national cemeteries, major military installations, VA medical centers, and all United States Postal Service post offices. It specifies display on key patriotic holidays (Armed Forces Day, Memorial Day, Flag Day, Independence Day, National POW/MIA Recognition Day, Veterans Day) and continuously at certain memorials and VA centers.

FOUND

Mandates the Administrator of General Services (GSA) to commence the procurement and distribution of Honor and Remember Flags within 30 days of the Act's enactment to ensure compliance with the display requirements.

Section 2(e)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice for placing implementation details. However, it implicitly carries significant unquantified fiscal implications.

Case for: This provision ensures prompt implementation of the bill's intent by initiating the necessary logistical steps for flag manufacturing and distribution, allowing federal agencies to comply with the display mandates quickly.

Case against: Without a specific appropriation, this mandate places an unfunded burden on the GSA and subsequently on the budgets of the various federal agencies required to display the flags, potentially diverting resources from other priorities.

Estimated impact: Will incur costs for flag manufacturing and distribution, potentially millions of dollars depending on the number of flags required for all specified locations (e.g., thousands of USPS post offices, VA medical centers, national cemeteries, military installations).

FOUND

Requires the head of each department, agency, or establishment responsible for a location specified for flag display to prescribe necessary regulations to carry out the section within 180 days after enactment.

Section 2(d)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice for ensuring orderly implementation of new mandates through agency rulemaking.

Case for: Ensures orderly and consistent implementation of the flag display requirements across diverse federal entities by providing a framework for agencies to follow.

Case against: Adds administrative burden and resource allocation requirements to numerous federal agencies for drafting and implementing new regulations, potentially diverting resources from other priorities.

Estimated impact: Administrative costs for drafting, reviewing, and implementing regulations across multiple federal agencies.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this