The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
3 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in PLACED ON CALENDAR SENATEcompared with ENGROSSED IN HOUSE (Jul 22, 2026)

Technical corrections only. The diff reflects the bill's procedural advancement from being passed by the House to being received and placed on the calendar in the Senate, including updated legislative metadata. No substantive policy changes were made to the bill's text.

H.R. 1722·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 27, 2025

Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act

Passed HouseGovernment Operations and PoliticsSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Miller-Meeks, Mariannette [R-IA-1]
Committees
Oversight and Government Reform Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 23, 2026

Bottom line

This bill mandates transparency by requiring federal agencies to report on major taxpayer-funded projects that are significantly over budget or behind schedule, with the aim of increasing accountability.

What it actually does

This bill mandates that the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issue guidance requiring federal Executive and independent regulatory agencies to annually submit detailed information on "covered projects." These are projects either more than 5 years behind schedule or at least $1 billion over their original, inflation-adjusted cost estimate. The OMB Director must then compile this information into an annual report for Congress and public posting on the OMB website.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill enhances government transparency and accountability by shining a light on wasteful spending and inefficient project management. They contend that publicizing these "boondoggles" will pressure agencies to improve oversight, reduce cost overruns, and ensure projects are completed on time, ultimately saving taxpayer money and restoring public trust in government efficiency.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while the intent is good, the reporting requirements could create an excessive administrative burden on agencies, diverting resources from project management to compliance. They might also contend that the report could be used for political grandstanding rather than genuine problem-solving, potentially discouraging agencies from undertaking ambitious but necessary projects due to fear of public scrutiny over inevitable delays or cost adjustments.

The bill is very short and clear, allowing for a quick and thorough understanding of its provisions.

Section 2(a)

Definitions of Key Terms

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section establishes the scope of the bill by defining what constitutes a "covered agency" (most Executive and independent regulatory agencies) and, crucially, a "covered project." A project falls under this bill if it's either more than 5 years behind its original schedule or at least $1 billion over its original cost estimate, adjusted for inflation. It also clarifies what types of endeavors count as a "project," excluding direct spending.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFederal Executive and independent regulatory agenciesImpactIncreased reporting requirements and scrutiny for specific projects.MechanismLegal mandate to define and identify projects meeting specific criteria.ScaleApplies broadly to federal agencies and their major projects.
GroupTaxpayersImpactPotential for greater transparency regarding how their money is spent on large, troubled projects.MechanismPublic reporting of project failures.ScaleBroad public interest.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that clear definitions are essential for consistent and effective implementation, ensuring that only truly significant and problematic projects are captured, preventing an overwhelming reporting burden while focusing on the most impactful cases of waste or delay.

Critics contend

Opponents might argue that the thresholds ($1 billion over budget or 5 years behind schedule) are too high, potentially missing numerous smaller but still significant examples of mismanagement, or too low, capturing projects that faced unavoidable external factors. They might also contend that the definitions could be manipulated to exclude certain projects.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies in setting thresholds that are high enough to focus on truly major issues without being so high that they miss significant problems, and low enough to capture relevant projects without creating an unmanageable reporting burden.

Section 2(b)(1)

Agency Submission of Project Information

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that within one year of enactment, the OMB Director must issue guidance requiring covered agencies to annually submit detailed information about each of their covered projects. This information includes project purpose, location, contract numbers, initiation year, federal share of cost, primary contractors, changes to scope, original and current completion dates and cost estimates (inflation-adjusted), explanations for delays or cost increases, and any bonuses awarded.

Section 2(b)(2) and (3)

Public and Congressional Reporting by OMB

prominently featuredstraightforward

The Director of OMB is required to compile all the information submitted by agencies into an annual report. This report must be submitted to Congress and also posted publicly on the OMB website. While the report must be unclassified, it allows for a classified annex if necessary, ensuring that sensitive national security information can be protected while still providing public transparency where possible.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this