The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 1726·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 27, 2025

Project Safe Neighborhoods Reauthorization Act of 2025

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 27, 2025

Bottom line

The bill extends the Project Safe Neighborhoods program and broadens how its grants can be used, while also increasing reporting requirements for accountability.

What it actually does

This bill reauthorizes the Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN) Grant Program through fiscal year 2030, extending its funding eligibility. It also expands the allowable uses of PSN grant funds to include hiring crime analysts, covering overtime for law enforcement personnel, purchasing technology for crime reduction, and supporting multi-jurisdictional task forces. Additionally, the bill mandates increased transparency through annual reporting requirements from the Attorney General to Congress.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that reauthorizing the Project Safe Neighborhoods program is crucial for continuing a proven, nationwide initiative that effectively reduces violent crime by fostering collaboration among law enforcement and community stakeholders. They contend that expanding the allowable uses of funds will provide local agencies with greater flexibility to address modern crime challenges, such as leveraging data analysis and technology, and supporting critical multi-jurisdictional efforts.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while the program's intent is positive, simply extending authorization and broadening fund uses without a critical review of its past effectiveness or a significant increase in funding may not adequately address rising crime rates. Some may also raise concerns about the potential for increased overtime costs to strain local budgets or the risk of funds being diverted from community-based prevention efforts towards more enforcement-focused strategies.

The bill is concise and clearly structured, making it accessible for a quick and informed evaluation by any interested reader.

Section 3(c)

Reauthorization of Project Safe Neighborhoods Grant Program

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision extends the authorization for appropriations for the Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN) Grant Program. It changes the period of authorization from fiscal years 2019 through 2021 to fiscal years 2026 through 2030, ensuring the program can continue to receive federal funding for an additional five years.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFederal, State, local, and Tribal law enforcement agenciesImpactContinued eligibility for federal grant funding to support violent crime reduction initiatives.MechanismExtension of the statutory authority for appropriations.ScaleNationwide
GroupCommunities participating in PSNImpactContinued access to resources and collaborative programs aimed at reducing violent crime.MechanismOngoing federal support for local crime-fighting efforts.ScaleLocal and regional

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that extending the PSN program is essential to maintain a successful, collaborative framework for combating violent crime across the nation, allowing communities to continue benefiting from its proven strategies.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the general reauthorization of a program like PSN, though some might question the effectiveness of the program or advocate for different approaches to crime reduction.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension is between ensuring continued support for existing programs and evaluating their long-term effectiveness and adaptability to evolving crime trends.

Section 3(a) and 3(b)

Expansion of Allowable Uses for PSN Funds and New Definitions

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This provision amends the original 2018 Act to expand what Project Safe Neighborhoods grant funds can be used for. New uses include hiring crime analysts, covering overtime costs for law enforcement officers, prosecutors, and law enforcement assistants, and purchasing technology for violent crime reduction. It also adds definitions for 'crime analyst' and 'law enforcement assistant' to clarify who qualifies for these new funding categories.

Section 4

Support for Multi-Jurisdictional Task Forces

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section, titled the 'Officer Ella Grace French and Sergeant Jim Smith Task Force Support Act of 2025,' further amends the allowable uses of Project Safe Neighborhoods grant funds. It specifically adds 'support for multi-jurisdictional task forces' as an eligible expense, allowing PSN grants to directly fund collaborative efforts across different law enforcement jurisdictions.

Section 5

Transparency and Reporting Requirements

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that the Attorney General submit annual reports to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. These reports must detail how Project Safe Neighborhoods funds were spent in each operating area, the community outreach efforts undertaken, and the number and description of violent crime offenses (including murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault) committed in those areas during the preceding year.

FOUND

The bill adds specific definitions for 'crime analyst' and 'law enforcement assistant' to the Project Safe Neighborhoods Grant Program Authorization Act of 2018.

Section 3(a)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice for clarifying terms when expanding the scope of a program, ensuring legal precision.

Case for: Defining these terms clearly ensures that funds are used for their intended purpose and that eligible personnel are properly identified, preventing ambiguity in grant applications and expenditures.

Case against: No significant case against, as these are clarifying definitions that support the bill's intent.

Estimated impact: Clarifies eligibility for potentially hundreds of positions across various law enforcement agencies, enabling more targeted use of PSN funds.

FOUND

Section 4(a) names the section the 'Officer Ella Grace French and Sergeant Jim Smith Task Force Support Act of 2025,' while Section 4(b) is the operative amendment allowing PSN funds to support multi-jurisdictional task forces.

Section 4(a) and 4(b)

Why it matters:The naming of the section is a common legislative practice to honor individuals, while the policy change is integrated into the existing statutory framework for efficiency.

Case for: The dedication honors fallen officers, while the policy change provides crucial support for collaborative law enforcement efforts, which are often vital in complex criminal investigations.

Case against: No significant case against, as both aspects are generally viewed positively.

Estimated impact: Provides a dedicated funding stream for multi-jurisdictional task forces, potentially enhancing their operational capacity and effectiveness in combating organized crime.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this