The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 1730·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 27, 2025

No Alipay Act of 2025

IntroducedFinance and Financial SectorMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Ogles, Andrew [R-TN-5]
Committees
Financial Services Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 27, 2025

Bottom line

The "No Alipay Act of 2025" aims to eliminate the use of the Chinese payment platform Alipay for all financial transactions involving U.S. persons, citing national security or data privacy concerns.

What it actually does

This bill prohibits all financial transactions between AliPay (China) Internet Technology Company Limited and any United States person. This includes the use of Alipay's applications or payment processing services within the U.S., effectively banning the platform for U.S. individuals and entities.

Proponents argue

Proponents would argue that this bill is a critical step in safeguarding U.S. national security and protecting American consumers' financial data from potential access or exploitation by the Chinese government. They would assert that platforms like Alipay, originating from countries with adversarial intelligence policies, pose inherent risks that necessitate a complete ban to prevent data exfiltration, surveillance, or economic coercion.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that a blanket ban on Alipay could harm U.S. businesses and individuals who rely on the platform for legitimate transactions, particularly those engaged in international trade or tourism with China. They might also contend that such a prohibition could be seen as an overreach, potentially escalating trade tensions with China and limiting consumer choice without sufficient evidence of direct harm or a less restrictive alternative.

The bill text is extremely short and straightforward, requiring less than a minute to read, making it highly accessible for public review.

Section 2

Prohibition on Use of Alipay

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section explicitly forbids any financial transactions between AliPay (China) Internet Technology Company Limited and any individual or entity defined as a "United States person." This means that U.S. citizens, permanent residents, U.S.-organized businesses, and anyone physically present in the U.S. would be unable to use Alipay's payment app or its processing services for any transaction.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupUnited States persons (individuals and entities)ImpactProhibition on using Alipay for financial transactionsMechanismDirect legal ban on transactions and services.ScaleBroad, affecting any U.S. person who currently uses or might wish to use Alipay.
GroupAlipay (China) Internet Technology Company LimitedImpactLoss of U.S. market access and revenueMechanismLegal prohibition on its operations with U.S. persons.ScaleSignificant, as the U.S. market is substantial.
GroupU.S. businesses interacting with Chinese consumers/businessesImpactDisruption of payment methods, potential loss of businessMechanismInability to accept Alipay from customers, or send payments via Alipay to partners.ScalePotentially significant for businesses heavily reliant on transactions with Chinese counterparts or tourists.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this prohibition is essential for national security, preventing the Chinese government from accessing sensitive financial data of U.S. persons or leveraging a critical payment infrastructure for geopolitical influence. They would highlight the risks associated with data privacy and potential espionage.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that this ban is an overbroad measure that could inconvenience U.S. consumers and businesses, particularly those engaged in international commerce or tourism with China, without clear evidence of direct harm. They may also suggest it could be perceived as a protectionist measure or an escalation of economic tensions.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances national security concerns and data privacy against potential economic disruption for U.S. businesses and consumers, as well as the broader implications for U.S.-China trade relations and consumer choice in payment platforms.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this