The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 1906·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 6, 2025

Rural Wellness Act

IntroducedAgriculture and FoodSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13]
Committees
Agriculture Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 28, 2025

Bottom line

The bill extends existing rural health funding priorities while shifting focus to include behavioral and mental health services alongside substance abuse treatment.

What it actually does

This bill, the 'Rural Wellness Act,' extends the substance abuse disorder set-aside and priority under certain rural development programs from 2025 to 2029. It also reduces the percentage of funds set aside for substance abuse disorder projects from 20% to 17%. Crucially, it establishes new priorities for projects that provide behavioral and mental health treatment services when selecting grantees for essential community facilities loans/grants and rural health and safety education programs.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill addresses the growing crisis of behavioral and mental health in rural areas by ensuring that federal rural development programs prioritize these critical services. They contend that extending the existing substance abuse disorder provisions, even with a slight adjustment, maintains vital support while strategically expanding the scope to encompass a broader range of mental wellness needs, thereby improving overall rural health outcomes.

Opponents contend

Opponents, if any, might argue that reducing the substance abuse disorder set-aside from 20% to 17% could inadvertently diminish resources for a persistent and severe public health challenge. They might also suggest that while behavioral and mental health are important, diverting funds or diluting existing priorities could weaken the focus on specific, acute substance abuse issues that rural communities continue to face.

The bill is very short and clear, making it easy for any reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 2(1)

Extension of Substance Abuse Disorder Program Duration

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 to extend the period during which certain rural development programs must maintain a set-aside and priority for projects addressing substance abuse disorder. The expiration date is moved from 2025 to 2029, ensuring continued federal support for these initiatives for an additional four years.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupRural communitiesImpactContinued access to funding for substance abuse disorder treatment and prevention programs.MechanismExtension of federal program eligibility and priority.ScaleBroad, affecting all rural areas eligible for the programs.
GroupOrganizations providing substance abuse services in rural areasImpactContinued eligibility for federal loans and grants.MechanismExtension of program duration.ScaleDirect, impacting funding stability for these organizations.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that extending these provisions is crucial for maintaining momentum in the fight against substance abuse in rural areas, where access to treatment can be limited. They believe it provides stability for service providers and ensures ongoing federal commitment.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against extending programs that address public health crises, especially in underserved areas, unless there are concerns about program effectiveness or alternative funding priorities.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension is balancing the need for continued support for substance abuse initiatives with the introduction of new priorities, ensuring neither is unduly diluted.

Section 2(2)

Adjustment of Substance Abuse Disorder Set-Aside Percentage

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision modifies the percentage of funds set aside for substance abuse disorder projects within the specified rural development programs. It reduces the set-aside from 20% to 17%. This means a slightly smaller dedicated portion of funds will be allocated specifically for substance abuse initiatives, potentially freeing up a small percentage for other priorities, including the newly introduced behavioral and mental health priorities.

Section 2(3)(B)

New Priority for Behavioral and Mental Health Treatment Facilities

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision establishes a new selection priority for direct loans or grants under Section 306(a) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, which supports essential community facilities. The Secretary of Agriculture must now prioritize entities developing facilities for behavioral and mental health services (prevention, treatment, recovery) and those employing staff with appropriate expertise in these areas. This aims to boost infrastructure for mental health care in rural communities.

Section 2(4)

New Priority for Rural Health and Safety Education Programs

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision adds a new priority for grants made under Section 502(i) of the Rural Development Act of 1972, which pertains to rural health and safety education programs. The Secretary must now give priority to applicants who will use these grants specifically for behavioral and mental health education and treatment. This aims to enhance educational initiatives and outreach related to mental wellness in rural settings.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this