The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
4 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with ENGROSSED IN HOUSE (Jul 22, 2025)

Technical corrections only. The changes reflect the bill's procedural movement from the House to the Senate, updating the legislative status information. No substantive policy changes were made between v3 and v4.

H.R. 1917·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 6, 2025

Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025

Passed HouseEnvironmental ProtectionSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6]
Committees
Environment and Public Works Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 23, 2025

Bottom line

The bill creates a federally funded program to tag hatchery-raised fish in the Great Lakes, providing data to improve fishery management and support the regional economy.

What it actually does

This bill establishes the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program within the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. The program is designed to mass mark hatchery-produced fish in the Great Lakes basin to assess the effectiveness of hatchery operations and fisheries management actions. It authorizes the Director of the USFWS to purchase necessary equipment, tags, and hire personnel, while requiring collaboration with Federal, State, and Tribal fish management agencies to make collected data publicly available for various restoration and management objectives.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that the Great Lakes are undergoing rapid biological changes due to invasive species and food web alterations, necessitating a science-based approach to fishery management. They contend that mass marking is a precise and efficient tool to balance hatchery-produced and wild fish populations, evaluate the effectiveness of stocking and habitat restoration, and ultimately support the $7 billion Great Lakes regional economy and native species recovery efforts.

Opponents contend

No direct opposition to the establishment of a mass marking program is explicitly stated or widely apparent, as the initiative is generally viewed as a science-based conservation effort. Potential criticisms, if any, might center on the allocation of federal resources, questioning whether the authorized funding is sufficient or if other conservation strategies might yield greater returns, or administrative concerns about inter-agency coordination.

The bill is very short and straightforward, allowing for a quick and comprehensive understanding of its provisions within the time typically allotted for legislative review.

Section 4(a)

Establishment of Great Lakes Mass Marking Program

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section formally creates the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program within the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Its primary purpose is to mark hatchery-produced fish in the Great Lakes to help determine how effective hatchery operations are and how well fisheries management actions are working, all while supporting the overall health of Great Lakes fisheries.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupUnited States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)ImpactEstablishes a new program and responsibilities.MechanismDirect mandate to create and operate the program.ScaleFederal agency-wide, specific to Great Lakes region.
GroupGreat Lakes fisheries managers (Federal, State, Tribal)ImpactProvides a new tool and data source for decision-making.MechanismCollaboration and data sharing from the USFWS program.ScaleRegional impact on fishery management practices.
GroupHatchery operations in the Great LakesImpactRequires participation in mass marking efforts.MechanismIntegration of marking technology and processes into existing hatchery practices.ScaleDirect operational impact on fish production.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that formalizing this program is crucial for providing the scientific data needed to make informed decisions about fish stocking rates, species rehabilitation, and habitat restoration in the rapidly changing Great Lakes ecosystem. They emphasize that mass marking is a precise tool for balancing wild and hatchery fish populations and ensuring effective resource management.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the establishment of a science-based program for fishery management. Any potential concerns might relate to the administrative burden on existing agencies or the cost-effectiveness of mass marking compared to other research methods, though these are generally minor in the context of broader conservation goals.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the need for scientific data to inform management decisions with the operational costs and logistical complexities of implementing a large-scale mass marking program across multiple jurisdictions.

Section 4(b), (c), (d)

Program Operations, Collaboration, and Data Sharing

prominently featuredstraightforward

These subsections detail how the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program will operate. The Director of the USFWS is authorized to buy necessary equipment like fish tags and hire staff. Critically, the program mandates collaboration with various Federal, State, and Tribal fish management agencies, as well as the Great Lakes Fishery Commission. All data collected must be made available to these partners to improve management actions, support economic fisheries, and evaluate restoration efforts.

Section 5

Authorization of Appropriations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes the appropriation of $2,700,000 for each of the fiscal years 2026 through 2030 to carry out the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program. This funding is intended to cover the costs associated with purchasing equipment, fish tags, data processing, and hiring personnel as outlined in the program's operational mandates.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this