The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
4 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in REPORTED TO SENATEcompared with REFERRED IN SENATE (Jan 22, 2025)

Technical corrections only. The changes between v3 and v4 reflect procedural updates in the Senate, indicating that the bill was reported by the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. There are no substantive policy changes to the legislative text itself.

H.R. 197·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 3, 2025

Lake Winnibigoshish Land Exchange Act of 2025

Passed HousePublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8]
Committees
Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee (primary)
Last action
Oct 27, 2025

Bottom line

This bill facilitates a specific land exchange in Minnesota, aiming to consolidate federal land within the Chippewa National Forest while transferring a smaller parcel of federal land to a private entity, with the private entity bearing all associated costs.

What it actually does

This bill authorizes a specific land exchange in the Chippewa National Forest, Minnesota, between the U.S. Forest Service and Big Winnie Land and Timber, LLC (BWLT). BWLT would convey approximately 36.7 acres of non-Federal land to the United States, and in return, the Secretary of Agriculture would convey approximately 17.5 acres of Federal land to BWLT, reserving an easement for road access. The exchange is conditioned on equal value, determined by independent appraisals, with BWLT covering all associated costs and making a cash equalization payment if the Federal land is more valuable, or the difference being considered a donation if the non-Federal land is more valuable.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this land exchange will improve the management of the Chippewa National Forest by consolidating federal ownership of a larger, non-federal parcel, which can enhance ecological integrity, public access, and administrative efficiency. They emphasize that the exchange is for equal value, with the private party covering all costs, ensuring no financial burden on taxpayers and potentially resulting in a donation to the U.S. if the non-Federal land is more valuable.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that any transfer of federal land to private ownership, even for a land exchange, should be scrutinized to ensure it serves the public interest and does not set a precedent for further privatization of national forest lands. Concerns could be raised about the specific location of the federal parcel being exchanged and whether its public value outweighs the benefits of acquiring the non-federal parcel, or if the process adequately considers all environmental and public access implications beyond what is explicitly stated.

The bill is very short and straightforward, making it easy for any interested reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 3(a)

Authorization of Land Exchange

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service, to exchange land with Big Winnie Land and Timber, LLC (BWLT). If BWLT offers to convey approximately 36.7 acres of non-Federal land to the United States, the Secretary must accept the offer and convey approximately 17.5 acres of Federal land to BWLT within one year. The conveyance of Federal land will include a reserved easement for road access to National Forest System land west of the Federal Parcel.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupU.S. Forest ServiceImpactGains 36.7 acres of land, loses 17.5 acres, potentially consolidating management within the Chippewa National Forest.MechanismDirect land transfer as authorized by the Act.ScaleSpecific to a small area within Chippewa National Forest.
GroupBig Winnie Land and Timber, LLC (BWLT)ImpactGains 17.5 acres of Federal land, conveys 36.7 acres of non-Federal land.MechanismDirect land transfer as authorized by the Act.ScaleSpecific to BWLT's land holdings in Itasca County, Minnesota.
GroupPublic users of Chippewa National ForestImpactPotential changes to access or management of specific parcels, with a net increase in National Forest System land.MechanismConsolidation of federal land.ScaleLocalized impact.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this exchange is beneficial for the Forest Service as it allows for the acquisition of a larger parcel (36.7 acres) into the National Forest System in exchange for a smaller parcel (17.5 acres), leading to better land management and consolidation within the Chippewa National Forest. The reserved easement ensures continued public access where needed.

Critics contend

Critics might express concern over the precedent of transferring federal land to private entities, even if it's a net gain for the National Forest System in terms of acreage. They might question the specific value and ecological significance of the federal parcel being relinquished.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the goal of consolidating federal land for improved forest management against the transfer of a specific federal parcel to private ownership. The net gain in acreage for the National Forest System is a key factor in this balance.

Section 3(b), (c), (d), (h), (i)

Valuation, Equalization, and Cost Allocation

prominently featuredstraightforward

The land exchange must be for equal value, determined by independent and qualified appraisers mutually agreed upon by the Secretary and BWLT, following federal appraisal standards. If the appraised value of the Federal land exceeds the non-Federal land, BWLT must make a cash equalization payment to the United States. Conversely, if the non-Federal land's value exceeds the Federal land's value, the difference is waived and considered a donation by BWLT to the United States. Additionally, BWLT is responsible for paying all closing costs associated with the exchange, including title insurance, inspection fees, attorney fees, recording fees, environmental analysis (Phase I Environmental Site Assessment), and survey costs.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this