The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 2086·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 11, 2025

Rights for the TSA Workforce Act

IntroducedGovernment Operations and PoliticsMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Thompson, Bennie G. [D-MS-2]
Committees
Homeland Security Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 11, 2025

Bottom line

This bill integrates the TSA workforce into the standard federal civil service system, providing enhanced employee rights and benefits while aiming to stabilize the workforce and improve security operations.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the transition of all Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees from their current specialized personnel management system to the federal personnel system under Title 5, United States Code, by December 31, 2025. It grants TSA employees, particularly screening agents, full collective bargaining rights, civil service protections, and standard federal pay and benefits, while preserving certain existing pay structures for Federal Air Marshals and ensuring no reduction in pay or benefits during the conversion.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that bringing TSA employees under Title 5 will address long-standing issues of low morale, high turnover, and insufficient workplace protections, thereby enhancing the stability and effectiveness of the transportation security workforce. They contend that providing full federal employee rights, including collective bargaining and appeal processes, will professionalize the force, improve recruitment and retention, and ultimately strengthen national security.

Opponents contend

Opponents, if any, might argue that the unique security mission of the TSA requires a more flexible and specialized personnel system than Title 5 allows, potentially hindering the agency's ability to respond swiftly to evolving threats or manage its workforce efficiently. Concerns could also be raised about the potential increased costs associated with federalizing the entire workforce's pay and benefits, or the impact on management's discretion in personnel matters.

The bill is moderately detailed, requiring careful reading to understand the transition rules and their implications for various employee groups.

Section 3(a)

Immediate Freeze on TSA Personnel System Changes

prominently featuredstraightforward

Upon enactment, this provision immediately freezes any modifications to existing TSA personnel management systems, policies, or directives for covered employees and positions. It also terminates the authority to establish new human resources management systems under Chapter 97 of Title 5 for these employees, with exceptions for annual pay adjustments and policies addressing emerging threats or unaddressed matters. This ensures stability and prevents last-minute changes during the transition period.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupTransportation Security Administration (TSA) managementImpactRestricted ability to unilaterally change personnel policies.MechanismLegal prohibition on modifications and new policies.ScaleAgency-wide
GroupCovered TSA employeesImpactPrevents adverse changes to current conditions during transition.MechanismLegal prohibition on modifications and new policies.ScaleWorkforce-wide

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this freeze is crucial to prevent the Administration from making last-minute changes to personnel systems that could undermine the intent of the bill or complicate the transition to Title 5. It ensures stability and protects employee rights during the interim period.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that this restriction limits the agency's flexibility to adapt to operational needs or improve existing systems, even if those changes would be beneficial, during a potentially lengthy transition period.

Tradeoffs

Balances the need for stability and employee protection during a transition against the agency's need for operational flexibility.

Section 3(c)

Full Conversion of TSA Workforce to Title 5

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section mandates that by December 31, 2025, all TSA personnel management systems, including specific authorities under the Aviation and Transportation Security Act and Title 49, will cease to be effective. At this 'conversion date,' all covered TSA employees and positions will become subject to the provisions of Title 5, United States Code, granting them standard federal employee rights and benefits, including civil service protections and access to federal appeals processes.

Section 3(c)(2)

Expedited Collective Bargaining and Appeals Rights

mentioned in summarystraightforward

Within 90 days of enactment, Chapters 71 (Labor-Management Relations) and 77 (Appeals) of Title 5, United States Code, will apply to covered employees carrying out screening functions. This grants screening agents early access to collective bargaining rights and the federal appeals process, superseding any conflicting TSA policies, significantly ahead of the full Title 5 conversion.

Section 4(a)

Pay and Compensation Safeguards During Conversion

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision ensures that no covered employee will experience a reduction in their adjusted basic pay or law enforcement availability pay (LEAP) when converting from the TSA personnel system to Title 5. It also mandates that years of service in specific TSA pay bands will be credited towards determining the appropriate step within a General Schedule grade, preserving pay progression and preventing financial detriment during the transition.

Section 4(d)

Enhanced Pay Protections for Federal Air Marshals

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section amends Title 5 to explicitly apply Law Enforcement Availability Pay (LEAP) provisions to Federal Air Marshals (FAMs) who are TSA employees, ensuring they continue to receive LEAP. It also guarantees that FAMs receive overtime pay at a rate no less than what they would receive under the Fair Labor Standards Act, preserving their current higher overtime rates. These amendments take effect on the conversion date, maintaining specialized compensation for FAMs.

Section 5(a)

Establishment of Exclusive Representative and National Bargaining

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision designates the labor organization certified on June 29, 2011 (or its successor) as the exclusive representative for screening agents under Title 5, Chapter 71, upon its application. It also mandates that collective bargaining for covered employees will occur at the national level, though it can be supplemented by local agreements with mutual consent, providing a clear framework for labor relations.

Section 6

Prohibition on Strikes

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section explicitly states that nothing in the Act repeals or affects existing federal laws prohibiting strikes against the Government (18 U.S.C. 1918 and 5 U.S.C. 7311), nor does it authorize any activity not permitted under those laws. This clarifies that while TSA employees gain collective bargaining rights, they do not gain the right to strike, consistent with federal law for other government employees.

Section 8

GAO Reviews of TSA Workforce and Implementation

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section mandates several Government Accountability Office (GAO) reviews: one on TSA recruitment efforts (including for veterans), one on the implementation of this Act, one on promotion policies and leadership diversity, and one on harassment and assault policies and protections for TSA staff. Reports are due within one year of enactment or one year after the conversion date, providing independent oversight and recommendations.

FOUND

This provision allows covered employees with grievances or appeals pending at the time of enactment or initiated during the transition period to either remove them to Title 5 proceedings or continue them within TSA's internal system. It also preserves all timelines for unadjudicated appeals until Title 5 rights become fully available, ensuring due process.

Section 3(d)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to ensure continuity and fairness for ongoing administrative processes during a transition, preventing employees from being disadvantaged by the change in legal framework.

Case for: Supporters argue this ensures that employees are not disadvantaged by the transition, allowing them to choose the most favorable or expedient path for their existing grievances and preserving their rights.

Case against: No specific opposition, as it's a procedural safeguard.

Estimated impact: Affects a limited number of employees with active grievances, ensuring their due process rights are maintained during the conversion.

FOUND

Notwithstanding Title 5, Section 7112, this provision explicitly states that screening agents shall remain eligible to form a collective bargaining unit after Chapter 71 of Title 5 applies. This ensures the continuity of collective representation for a critical segment of the TSA workforce.

Section 4(e)

Why it matters:This is a technical clarification to ensure that the specific category of 'screening agents' retains its collective bargaining eligibility, which might otherwise be subject to interpretation under standard Title 5 rules. It reinforces the intent of Section 3(c)(2).

Case for: Proponents argue this ensures the continuity of collective representation for a critical and large segment of the TSA workforce, preventing any ambiguity that might arise from the Title 5 conversion.

Case against: No specific opposition, as it reinforces the core intent of granting collective bargaining rights.

Estimated impact: Confirms collective bargaining rights for all TSA screening agents, ensuring their ability to organize and negotiate.

FOUND

This section mandates the preservation of several specific employee rights post-conversion, including accrued annual and sick leave, health benefit pay premiums for part-time screening agents, appropriate leave during national emergencies, split-shift differential for eligible screening agents, and group retention incentives for eligible covered employees.

Section 4(f)

Why it matters:These are detailed protections for specific benefits that might otherwise be lost or altered during a broad personnel system conversion. They are crucial for employee morale and continuity but are not central to the main policy shift.

Case for: Supporters argue these specific protections are vital to ensure that the conversion to Title 5 genuinely improves conditions for employees and does not inadvertently strip away valuable existing benefits or create new disadvantages.

Case against: No specific opposition, as these are generally seen as employee-friendly provisions.

Estimated impact: Ensures continuity of specific benefits for various groups of TSA employees, potentially incurring minor administrative costs for maintaining these specific pay and leave structures.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this