The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 2165·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 14, 2025

Choice in Automobile Retail Sales Act of 2025

IntroducedEnvironmental ProtectionMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Walberg, Tim [R-MI-5]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 27, 2025

Bottom line

The bill aims to prevent the EPA from using tailpipe emissions regulations to effectively force a transition away from internal combustion engine vehicles by restricting technology mandates and ensuring broad vehicle availability.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Clean Air Act to prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from issuing tailpipe emissions regulations that mandate specific technologies or result in limited availability of new motor vehicles based on engine type. It also requires the EPA to revise any existing regulations issued since January 1, 2021, to comply with these new restrictions within 24 months of the bill's enactment.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue this bill protects consumer choice by ensuring a diverse market of new vehicles, including gasoline-powered cars, remains available. They contend that current or proposed EPA regulations are overreaching, effectively mandating electric vehicles through stringent emissions standards, and that this bill restores balance by focusing on emissions outcomes rather than dictating specific technologies or limiting vehicle types. They also emphasize preventing economic harm to industries reliant on traditional vehicle manufacturing and sales.

Opponents contend

Opponents would argue that this bill undermines the EPA's authority to address climate change and air pollution by hamstringing its ability to set effective emissions standards. They contend that preventing technology mandates and ensuring 'availability' could be interpreted to block regulations necessary to drive innovation towards cleaner vehicles, thereby slowing the transition to electric vehicles and exacerbating environmental and public health issues. They might also argue it prioritizes fossil fuel industries over public health and environmental protection.

The bill text is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for a quick read and understanding its core intent.

Section 2(a) of the bill, amending Section 202(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7521(a)(2))

Prohibiting Technology Mandates and Limiting Vehicle Availability in Tailpipe Regulations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Clean Air Act to explicitly state that any tailpipe emissions regulation issued by the EPA since January 1, 2021, or any future regulation, cannot force automakers to use a specific technology (like electric powertrains) or result in fewer new vehicle options based on their engine type (e.g., gasoline, diesel). It aims to prevent regulations from indirectly mandating electric vehicles by making it impossible for internal combustion engine vehicles to meet standards.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupAutomobile manufacturersImpactRegulatory relief/flexibilityMechanismPrevents EPA from mandating specific technologies or limiting vehicle types in tailpipe emissions regulations.ScaleIndustry-wide, affecting all new motor vehicle production and sales in the U.S.
GroupConsumersImpactMaintained choice/availabilityMechanismEnsures a broader range of vehicle types, including internal combustion engine vehicles, remains available in the new car market.ScaleNational, affecting all new car buyers.
GroupEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)ImpactRestricted regulatory authorityMechanismLimits the tools the EPA can use to achieve emissions reductions, specifically preventing technology mandates and restrictions on engine types.ScaleFederal agency, impacting its ability to regulate vehicle emissions.
GroupEnvironmental advocates/Public healthImpactPotential negative impact on emissions reduction goalsMechanismBy limiting EPA's regulatory options, it could slow the transition to lower-emission vehicles, potentially impacting air quality and climate goals.ScaleNational, affecting public health and environmental quality.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision is crucial for protecting consumer freedom and preventing government overreach into the auto market. They believe the EPA has been using its regulatory power to effectively ban gasoline-powered vehicles, and this amendment ensures that consumers can continue to choose the vehicles that best suit their needs and budgets, while still allowing for emissions reductions through other means.

Critics contend

Critics contend that this provision severely weakens the EPA's ability to combat climate change and improve air quality. They argue that by prohibiting technology mandates and ensuring 'availability' of all engine types, the bill would prevent the EPA from setting ambitious standards necessary to drive innovation towards zero-emission vehicles, thereby locking in higher emissions for longer.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances consumer choice and industry flexibility against the urgency of climate action and public health goals. It creates a tension between market-driven innovation and regulatory-driven environmental targets, potentially slowing the transition to cleaner transportation technologies in favor of maintaining a diverse vehicle market.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this