The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 2323·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 25, 2025

Big Bend National Park Boundary Adjustment Act

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Gonzales, Tony [R-TX-23]
Committees
Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 10, 2026

Bottom line

This bill enables the expansion of Big Bend National Park by allowing the acquisition of 6,100 acres through voluntary means, integrating new land into the park's protected area.

What it actually does

This bill authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire approximately 6,100 acres of land or interests in land to expand the boundary of Big Bend National Park in Texas. The acquisition is strictly limited to donation or exchange, explicitly prohibiting the use of eminent domain or condemnation. Once acquired, these lands will be incorporated into the park and administered under existing national park laws.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that expanding Big Bend National Park protects additional ecologically significant land, enhances conservation efforts, and potentially improves visitor access or recreational opportunities within a renowned national park. They emphasize the voluntary nature of the acquisition (donation or exchange) as respectful of private property rights and a collaborative approach to land management.

Opponents contend

Opponents might raise concerns about potential federal land expansion, even if voluntary, or question the specific tracts chosen for inclusion. Some may argue against any expansion of federal holdings, preferring private land ownership or state control, or express concerns about the long-term management costs associated with a larger park.

The bill is very short and easy to read, allowing ample time for public review and understanding of its provisions.

Section 3

Big Bend National Park Boundary Adjustment and Land Acquisition

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire approximately 6,100 acres of land or interests in land for Big Bend National Park. The acquisition must be done through donation or exchange, explicitly prohibiting the use of eminent domain or condemnation. Once acquired, these lands will be added to the park's boundary and managed according to existing national park laws and regulations.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupBig Bend National ParkImpactExpansion of protected areaMechanismAddition of 6,100 acres through donation or exchange.ScaleSignificant increase in park acreage.
GroupLandowners of the 6,100 acresImpactOpportunity to sell or exchange land with the federal government.MechanismVoluntary transaction with the Secretary of the Interior.ScaleDirect impact on specific individuals/entities.
GroupGeneral public/Park visitorsImpactPotential for expanded recreational opportunities and conservation benefits.MechanismLarger park area for exploration and ecological preservation.ScaleBroad, long-term benefit.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision is crucial for enhancing the ecological integrity and recreational value of Big Bend National Park by allowing for strategic land acquisitions that consolidate park boundaries and protect critical habitats. The voluntary nature of the acquisition ensures respect for private property rights.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that any expansion of federal land, even through voluntary means, reduces the private land base and could lead to increased federal management responsibilities and costs. Some may also express concern about the specific parcels being targeted for acquisition.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the goal of conservation and park expansion with the protection of private property rights by mandating voluntary acquisition methods. It also involves a tradeoff between the benefits of a larger protected area and the potential increase in federal management obligations.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this