The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 2538·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 1, 2025

CARE Act of 2025

IntroducedHealthMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Carey, Mike [R-OH-15]
Committees
Ways and Means Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 1, 2025

Bottom line

The CARE Act of 2025 aims to improve emergency medical service efficiency and patient outcomes by allowing Medicare to pay for non-transport ambulance responses and associated telehealth services, potentially reducing unnecessary hospitalizations.

What it actually does

The bill mandates the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) to establish a new 5-year model, the Comprehensive Alternative Response for Emergencies (CARE) Model, under Medicare Part B. This model will allow ground ambulance service providers to receive payment for emergency medical calls that involve dispatching an ambulance but do not result in patient transport, provided services are furnished according to state and local protocols. It also treats the patient's location as an originating site for telehealth services furnished in conjunction with these emergency responses.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that the bill addresses a critical gap in Medicare coverage, where ambulance services are currently only reimbursed if a patient is transported. This model would enable paramedics and EMTs to provide appropriate on-scene care, including telehealth consultations, without requiring transport, thereby reducing unnecessary emergency department visits and improving patient care in place. It acknowledges the significant resources expended on non-transport calls.

Opponents contend

Opponents might raise concerns about potential for over-utilization of ambulance services if non-transport calls are reimbursed, leading to increased Medicare costs. There could also be questions about the oversight and quality control of services provided without transport, and whether sufficient safeguards are in place to prevent fraud or abuse in a new payment model.

The bill is concise and can be read quickly, allowing ample time for stakeholders to understand its core provisions.

Section 2(a)(1)(A) and (2) amending Section 1115A(b)(2)(A) and adding Section 1115A(h) of the Social Security Act

Establishment of Comprehensive Alternative Response for Emergencies (CARE) Model

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision requires the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) to implement the CARE Model within two years of the bill's enactment. This model will allow Medicare Part B to pay ground ambulance service providers for emergency responses where an ambulance is dispatched, but the patient is not transported to a hospital, provided services are rendered according to state and local protocols, including potential telehealth use.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupMedicare beneficiariesImpactImproved access to on-scene emergency medical care without mandatory transport, potentially reducing unnecessary hospital visits.MechanismDirect payment for non-transport services.ScaleNational, affecting all Medicare Part B enrollees.
GroupGround ambulance service providersImpactNew revenue stream for services currently unreimbursed, potentially improving financial stability and incentivizing appropriate on-scene care.MechanismDirect payment for non-transport services.ScaleNational, affecting all Medicare-participating ground ambulance providers.
GroupEmergency departmentsImpactPotential reduction in non-urgent emergency department visits.MechanismDiversion of patients to on-scene care or telehealth.ScaleNational.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision is crucial for modernizing emergency medical services, allowing providers to deliver appropriate care in the field without the financial pressure to transport patients unnecessarily. This can lead to better patient outcomes and more efficient use of healthcare resources.

Critics contend

Critics might express concern that mandating a specific model limits CMMI's flexibility to innovate and test other approaches. They may also worry about the financial implications of a new, potentially broad payment stream without sufficient data on its long-term cost-effectiveness.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between ensuring appropriate reimbursement for valuable on-scene care and managing potential increases in Medicare spending due to a new payment category.

Section 2(a)(2) adding Section 1115A(h)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act

Alignment of Payment Rates for Non-Transport Services

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to set payment rates for services under the CARE Model. These rates are to generally align with payments that would have been made if the services had resulted in a transport payable under existing Medicare law (Section 1834(l)). This ensures that providers are compensated fairly for their emergency response efforts, regardless of whether transport occurs.

Section 2(a)(2) adding Section 1115A(h)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act

Telehealth Originating Site Designation

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision specifies that when a telehealth service, payable under Medicare Part B (Section 1834(m)), is provided in conjunction with CARE Model services, the location where the Medicare beneficiary is receiving the telehealth service will be considered an "originating site." This allows for an originating site facility fee to be paid, facilitating the use of telehealth in emergency response scenarios.

Section 2(a)(2) adding Section 1115A(h)(3) of the Social Security Act

Five-Year Model Duration

mentioned in summarystraightforward

The CARE Model is mandated to be carried out for a period of five years. This duration provides sufficient time to collect data, evaluate the model's effectiveness, and assess its impact on beneficiary outcomes and resource utilization before making decisions about permanent implementation.

Section 2(b)

GAO Report on CARE Model Impact

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section requires the Comptroller General of the United States (GAO) to submit a report to Congress within four years of the CARE Model's implementation. The report will analyze various aspects of Medicare beneficiaries' access to emergency medical services, compare outcomes under the model with traditional transport, assess regional variations, identify best practices and challenges, and provide recommendations for improving emergency medical services.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this