The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 2628·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 3, 2025

American Innovation Act

IntroducedScience, Technology, CommunicationsMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Foster, Bill [D-IL-11]
Committees
Budget Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 3, 2025

Bottom line

This bill mandates a significant, long-term increase in federal funding for basic science and technology research across multiple agencies, aiming to bolster American innovation and global competitiveness while shielding these investments from future budget cuts.

What it actually does

This bill authorizes and appropriates specific, increasing amounts of funding for five key federal science agencies: the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy's Office of Science, Department of Defense science and technology programs, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and NASA's Science Mission Directorate. These appropriations span fiscal years 2026 through 2035, with inflation adjustments thereafter. The bill also explicitly exempts these appropriations from sequestration orders and Statutory Pay-As-You-Go (PAYGO) rules.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that a sustained, increasing investment in basic science research is crucial for long-term economic growth, national security, and maintaining America's global leadership in scientific discovery and technological innovation. They emphasize that predictable, protected funding allows for ambitious, multi-year research projects, attracts top talent, and ensures the U.S. remains at the forefront of scientific advancement.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that such large, mandatory appropriations, particularly those exempted from PAYGO and sequestration, bypass the regular budget process and could lead to unchecked spending or divert funds from other critical areas. Concerns could also be raised about the long-term commitment to specific agencies without regular oversight, potentially contributing to the national debt.

The bill is concise and its core provisions are easily understood, making it accessible for a quick review by an informed reader.

Section 2(a)

Mandated Appropriations for Federal Science Agencies

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision directly authorizes and appropriates specific, increasing dollar amounts for five major federal science and technology entities: the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Department of Energy's Office of Science, Department of Defense (DoD) science and technology programs, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) scientific and technical research and services, and NASA's Science Mission Directorate. These appropriations span fiscal years 2026 through 2035, with subsequent years adjusted for inflation based on the Consumer Price Index.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFederal science agencies (NSF, DOE Office of Science, DoD S&T, NIST, NASA SMD)ImpactSignificant increase in budget and operational capacity, enabling expanded research initiatives and infrastructure development.MechanismDirect, mandated appropriations over a ten-year period, with inflation adjustments thereafter.ScaleBillions of dollars annually, increasing year-over-year.
GroupScientific researchers and institutions (universities, national labs, private sector R&D)ImpactIncreased opportunities for grants, collaborative projects, and employment in basic science and technology fields.MechanismExpanded funding for research programs and facilities administered by the recipient agencies.ScaleBroad impact across academic, government, and private research sectors, fostering a more robust research ecosystem.
GroupU.S. economy and industryImpactPotential for new technologies, industries, and job creation through scientific advancements and innovation spurred by basic research.MechanismInvestment in fundamental research leading to long-term technological and economic benefits.ScaleLong-term, potentially transformative impact on national competitiveness and economic growth.

Supporters argue

Supporters contend that this provision provides the stable, long-term funding necessary for groundbreaking scientific discoveries and technological advancements, which are essential for national competitiveness, economic prosperity, and addressing complex global challenges. They argue that predictable funding allows for strategic planning and attracts top talent.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that locking in such substantial, increasing appropriations for a decade removes flexibility from future budget decisions and could lead to inefficient spending without adequate annual review. Concerns could also be raised about the sheer volume of spending and its potential impact on the national debt.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between the desire for predictable, sustained investment in science to foster long-term innovation and national advantage versus the need for annual budgetary flexibility and oversight to respond to changing national priorities and fiscal conditions. This provision prioritizes long-term commitment over short-term adaptability.

Section 2(d) and 2(e)

Exemption from Sequestration and PAYGO Rules

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This provision amends the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act to explicitly exempt the appropriations made under the American Innovation Act from future sequestration orders. Additionally, it specifies that the budgetary effects of this section will not be entered on either statutory PAYGO scorecards or Senate PAYGO scorecards. This effectively protects the mandated funding increases from automatic budget cuts and prevents them from being offset by other spending cuts or tax increases under current budget rules.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
Ask Ledger AI about this