The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 2726·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 8, 2025

Paula Bohovesky and Joan D’Alessandro Act

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 8, 2025

Bottom line

The bill expands the scope of federal sexual offenses against minors that are eligible for the most severe penalties, including death or life imprisonment, by raising the victim's age threshold from under 14 to under 18.

What it actually does

This bill amends title 18, United States Code, specifically section 3559(d)(1)(A), to expand the definition of a 'crime of violence' for federal sentencing purposes. It adds sexual offenses where the victim has not attained the age of 18 years to the list of crimes that can trigger enhanced penalties, which can include life imprisonment or the death penalty under existing law. Previously, this section applied to victims under 14 years.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill strengthens protections for children by ensuring that individuals who commit sexual offenses against minors face the most severe federal penalties available. They contend it provides justice for victims and acts as a strong deterrent against such heinous crimes, reflecting society's condemnation of child sexual abuse and closing a perceived loophole in current law.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that existing laws already provide significant penalties for child sexual abuse and that expanding the scope of offenses eligible for the death penalty or life imprisonment raises concerns about the application of such extreme punishments, potential for wrongful convictions, and disproportionate sentencing. Some may also question the effectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent or advocate for a focus on prevention and rehabilitation.

The bill is extremely short and straightforward, requiring minimal time to read and understand its direct impact on federal sentencing law.

Section 2

Expanding Penalties for Sexual Offenses Against Minors

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends a specific part of federal law, 18 U.S.C. 3559(d)(1)(A), which defines certain 'crimes of violence' that are subject to enhanced sentencing. Currently, this section applies to offenses where the victim is under 14 years old. The bill expands this to include any sexual offense where the victim has not attained the age of 18 years, thereby making these crimes eligible for the most severe federal penalties, which can include life imprisonment or the death penalty under certain circumstances.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupIndividuals convicted of federal sexual offenses against minorsImpactIncreased severity of potential penalties, including eligibility for life imprisonment or the death penalty.MechanismAmendment to 18 U.S.C. 3559(d)(1)(A) expanding the age threshold for certain 'crimes of violence' to include victims under 18.ScaleApplies nationwide to federal convictions for specified sexual offenses.
GroupChild victims of sexual offenses (ages 14-17)ImpactEnhanced legal protections and potential for more severe justice for perpetrators of crimes committed against them.MechanismStronger sentencing guidelines for crimes committed against them.ScaleApplies to all child victims under 18 in federal cases.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this provision is a necessary step to ensure that the most heinous crimes against children are met with the most severe consequences, providing a stronger deterrent and a measure of justice for victims and their families. They believe it closes a loophole by extending the enhanced penalties to all sexual offenses against minors up to age 18, recognizing the severe trauma inflicted regardless of the specific age within the minor category.

Critics contend

Opponents may argue that existing federal sentencing guidelines already provide substantial penalties for child sexual abuse, and that expanding the scope of offenses eligible for the death penalty or life imprisonment could lead to overly harsh sentences or raise constitutional concerns regarding cruel and unusual punishment. Some may also argue that the focus should be on prevention and rehabilitation rather than solely on punitive measures.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the desire for severe punishment and deterrence for child sexual abuse against concerns about the scope and application of extreme penalties, including the death penalty, and potential legal challenges related to sentencing proportionality and the Eighth Amendment.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this