The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 2872·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 10, 2025

RESILIENCE Act of 2025

IntroducedTaxationSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Miller, Carol D. [R-WV-1]
Committees
Ways and Means Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 10, 2025

Bottom line

This bill provides tax relief to public utility companies by allowing specific repair and maintenance expenses to reduce their corporate alternative minimum tax liability.

What it actually does

The RESILIENCE Act of 2025 amends the Internal Revenue Code to modify the calculation of adjusted financial statement income (AFSI) for purposes of the corporate alternative minimum tax (CAMT). Specifically, it allows public utility companies to reduce their AFSI by certain repair and maintenance deductions related to public utility property, provided these expenses are treated as depreciation on their financial statements. This change aims to reduce the CAMT liability for affected public utilities.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill provides essential tax relief to public utilities, encouraging vital investment in critical infrastructure repair and maintenance. They contend that aligning tax treatment with financial accounting for these expenditures will reduce compliance burdens and free up capital for necessary upgrades, ultimately benefiting consumers through more reliable and efficient services and supporting job creation in the utility sector.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that this bill creates a new tax loophole for large public utility corporations, potentially eroding the corporate alternative minimum tax base which was designed to ensure profitable corporations pay a minimum level of tax. They may contend that it disproportionately benefits shareholders and executives rather than consumers, and could lead to reduced federal revenue without clear evidence of direct consumer benefit or increased infrastructure investment that wouldn't otherwise occur.

The bill is very short and directly amends a specific section of the tax code, making it relatively quick to read and understand for those familiar with tax law.

Section 2(a), amending Section 56A(c)(13) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

Inclusion of Public Utility Repair and Maintenance Deductions in AFSI Calculation

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision modifies the calculation of Adjusted Financial Statement Income (AFSI) for the Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax (CAMT). It allows public utilities to subtract certain repair and maintenance expenses from their AFSI. These are expenses for public utility property (as defined in section 168(i)(10)) that are already treated as depreciation on the utility's financial statements. The goal is to ensure these specific repair and maintenance costs reduce a utility's taxable income for CAMT purposes, similar to how depreciation is handled.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupPublic utility companies (specifically those owning property described in section 168(i)(10))ImpactReduced corporate alternative minimum tax liabilityMechanismBy allowing certain repair and maintenance deductions to reduce Adjusted Financial Statement Income (AFSI)ScalePotentially significant for large utilities with substantial repair and maintenance expenditures
GroupFederal government (tax revenue)ImpactPotential decrease in tax revenueMechanismReduced CAMT payments from affected utilitiesScaleDepends on the total amount of qualifying deductions claimed by utilities

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this adjustment corrects an unintended consequence of the CAMT, which can penalize utilities for essential infrastructure upkeep. By allowing these deductions, the bill encourages utilities to invest in maintaining and improving their networks, which is crucial for reliability and efficiency, ultimately benefiting consumers and the economy.

Critics contend

Opponents might contend that this provision carves out a special tax break for a specific industry, undermining the intent of the CAMT to ensure all profitable corporations pay a fair share. They may argue that the existing tax code already provides mechanisms for deducting business expenses, and this change could lead to a loss of federal revenue that could be used for other public services.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the goal of ensuring profitable corporations pay a minimum tax (CAMT) against the desire to incentivize investment in critical public utility infrastructure. It also navigates the tension between simplifying tax compliance for specific industries and maintaining a broad, equitable tax base.

FOUND

The bill defines "applicable public utility repair and maintenance deductions" by referencing "property described in section 168(i)(10)". This section of the Internal Revenue Code refers to "public utility property" which is defined as property used predominantly in the trade or business of furnishing or selling electrical energy, water, sewage disposal services, gas, or steam through a local distribution system, or transportation of gas or steam by pipeline, if the rates for such furnishing or sale have been established or approved by a state or federal regulatory body.

Section 2(a), amending Section 56A(c)(13)(B)(i)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to avoid reprinting lengthy definitions already present in the existing tax code, ensuring consistency and brevity in the bill text.

Case for: Referencing existing code sections streamlines legislation and ensures legal precision by relying on established definitions. It avoids redundancy and potential inconsistencies that could arise from re-defining terms.

Case against: For a lay reader, the reliance on external code references makes the bill less accessible and requires specialized knowledge to fully understand its scope and implications. This can obscure who precisely benefits from the legislation.

Estimated impact: This reference clarifies the specific types of utility infrastructure (e.g., power lines, water pipes, gas pipelines) whose repair and maintenance costs would qualify for the tax deduction, thereby defining the scope of the tax relief.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this