The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 2881·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 10, 2025

COAST Anti-Drilling Act of 2025

IntroducedEnergyMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Pallone, Frank [D-NJ-6]
Committees
Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 10, 2025

Bottom line

H.R. 2881 seeks to permanently ban offshore oil and gas drilling in significant portions of the Atlantic Ocean, aiming to protect coastal environments and economies from the risks associated with fossil fuel extraction.

What it actually does

This bill, titled the 'Clean Ocean And Safe Tourism Anti-Drilling Act of 2025' or 'COAST Anti-Drilling Act of 2025,' amends the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit the issuance of any leases or authorizations for the exploration, development, or production of oil, natural gas, or any other mineral in the North Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida planning areas. It references the 2024-2029 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program for the precise definition of these areas.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill is a critical step to safeguard fragile marine ecosystems, prevent catastrophic oil spills that could devastate coastal tourism and fishing industries, and align the United States with global efforts to transition to clean energy. They emphasize the long-term economic benefits of preserving natural coastlines over short-term gains from fossil fuel extraction.

Opponents contend

Opponents contend that this prohibition unnecessarily restricts access to vital domestic energy resources, which could lead to increased energy costs for consumers, greater reliance on foreign energy sources, and job losses in the oil and gas sector. They argue that modern drilling technologies are safe and that domestic production is crucial for national energy security.

The bill text is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its core purpose quickly.

Section 2, amending 43 U.S.C. 1337

Permanent Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Atlantic OCS Areas

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act by adding a new subsection (q). This new subsection explicitly forbids the Secretary of the Interior from issuing any leases or other authorizations for the exploration, development, or production of oil, natural gas, or other minerals in four specific planning areas: the North Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida. The exact boundaries of these areas are defined by reference to the 2024-2029 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupCoastal communities and tourism/fishing industries in the Atlantic regionsImpactPositive, through environmental protection and reduced risk of oil spills.MechanismElimination of potential offshore drilling activities.ScaleSignificant, protecting billions in economic activity.
GroupEnvironmental advocacy groups and conservationistsImpactPositive, achieving long-sought conservation goals.MechanismStatutory protection of marine ecosystems.ScaleHigh, contributing to biodiversity and climate goals.
GroupOil and gas industryImpactNegative, loss of potential future leasing areas and exploration opportunities.MechanismPermanent statutory prohibition on access to specific OCS regions.ScaleSignificant, impacting long-term investment and resource portfolios.
GroupFederal government (Bureau of Ocean Energy Management)ImpactChanges regulatory scope and potential loss of future lease revenue.MechanismReduced areas for lease management and revenue collection.ScaleModerate, affecting agency operations and federal budget.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this permanent prohibition is essential to protect the Atlantic coast's pristine beaches, vibrant marine life, and critical economic sectors like tourism and fishing from the inherent risks of offshore drilling, including oil spills and industrialization of coastal areas. They highlight the ecological and economic value of these areas.

Critics contend

Critics contend that permanently closing off these areas removes potential domestic energy sources, which could weaken U.S. energy independence and lead to higher energy costs. They argue that with advanced technology, offshore drilling can be conducted safely and that these resources are vital for national security and economic growth.

Tradeoffs

The provision navigates the tension between environmental conservation and the desire for domestic energy production. It prioritizes the protection of coastal ecosystems and economies over potential fossil fuel extraction, leading to a direct conflict with energy industry interests and arguments for energy security.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this