The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 2886·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 10, 2025

Defend our Coast Act

IntroducedEnergyMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Ross, Deborah K. [D-NC-2]
Committees
Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 10, 2025

Bottom line

The Defend our Coast Act aims to permanently protect the Mid-Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf from new oil and gas leasing, reflecting a broader policy shift towards renewable energy and environmental conservation.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit the Department of the Interior from issuing new leases for oil and gas exploration, development, or production in the Mid-Atlantic Planning Area. This area is specifically defined by the 2024-2029 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program from September 2023, effectively closing off a significant offshore region to future fossil fuel extraction.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that withdrawing the Mid-Atlantic from oil and gas leasing is crucial for protecting coastal economies, marine ecosystems, and mitigating climate change. They emphasize the risks of oil spills to tourism and fishing industries, the importance of preserving biodiversity, and the need to transition away from fossil fuels towards clean energy sources like offshore wind.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that restricting offshore drilling limits domestic energy production, potentially increasing reliance on foreign oil and gas, and could lead to higher energy costs for consumers. They may also contend that modern drilling technologies are safe and that offshore resources are vital for national energy security and job creation in the energy sector.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, requiring minimal time to read and understand its core intent.

Section 2

Withdrawal of Mid-Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf from Oil and Gas Disposition

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prevent the Secretary of the Interior from issuing any new leases for oil or gas exploration, development, or production in the Mid-Atlantic Planning Area. This area is specifically defined by the 2024-2029 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Proposed Final Program from September 2023, effectively making it off-limits for future fossil fuel activities.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupCoastal communities and tourism industry in Mid-Atlantic statesImpactPositive impact through reduced risk of oil spills and preservation of natural beauty.MechanismLegal prohibition of new offshore drilling.ScaleRegional, affecting multiple states' coastlines.
GroupFishing industryImpactPositive impact through protection of marine habitats and fisheries from drilling activities and potential spills.MechanismLegal prohibition of new offshore drilling.ScaleRegional.
GroupOil and gas industryImpactNegative impact through loss of potential future leasing opportunities and access to resources in the Mid-Atlantic.MechanismLegal prohibition of new offshore drilling.ScaleRegional, affecting companies interested in this area.
GroupEnvironmental advocacy groupsImpactPositive impact, aligning with conservation goals and climate change mitigation efforts.MechanismLegal prohibition of new offshore drilling.ScaleNational, with regional focus.
GroupEnergy consumersImpactPotentially negative if domestic supply is reduced, leading to higher prices, or negligible if alternative energy sources compensate.MechanismReduced domestic oil and gas supply.ScaleNational.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision is essential for safeguarding the Mid-Atlantic's pristine coastlines, vibrant marine life, and economically vital tourism and fishing industries from the inherent risks of offshore drilling, including catastrophic oil spills. They also highlight its role in advancing climate goals by limiting fossil fuel expansion.

Critics contend

Critics contend that this provision unnecessarily restricts access to valuable domestic energy resources, potentially undermining national energy security and increasing reliance on foreign energy sources. They argue it could lead to job losses in the energy sector and higher energy costs for consumers, without significantly impacting global climate change.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances environmental protection and climate change mitigation against potential impacts on domestic energy supply, energy independence, and economic opportunities within the fossil fuel industry. It also highlights the tension between regional economic interests (tourism, fishing) and national energy policy.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this